Hi all,
A number of people have suggested that it would be irresponsible to do the
Subversion migration while our mail infrastructure is in the terrible state
that it is. I strongly agree... and suggest that we commit to delaying the
Subversion migration if the mail infrastructure is not
quote who=Jeff Waugh
Another round-trip test.
Hah:
01:07:18 - leaves laptop, to gnome.org
01:08:26 - returns laptop, via gnome.org
Sweet.
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/
World domination is a community responsibility. -
ping
___
Gnome-infrastructure mailing list
Gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
ping
___
Gnome-infrastructure mailing list
Gnome-infrastructure@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
quote who=Matthias Clasen
ping
(Pings prompted by me. Those on this mailing list can be content to suffer
occasional non-mailing-list-like behaviour such as this. Jocks/suffer/etc.)
- Jeff
--
linux.conf.au 2007: Sydney, Australia http://lca2007.linux.org.au/
Building a
Hey,
I've installed mailgraph (and dependencies [1]) on menubar. This simple tool
has become a staple of my mail server maintenance arsenal - it's very useful
to have a quick visual guide to how your mail server is running. It's pretty
interesting already. :-)
I've also copied qshape from
On อา., 2006-07-09 at 21:50 -0600, Gary Ekker wrote:
On Sun, 2006-07-09 at 18:36 +0700, Ross Golder wrote:
Now would be an ideal opportunity to let us know about any old CVS
modules you know about that are redundant, so we can put them out of the
way in the Attic before the migration.
I
