Christian Stadelmann commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/376#note_961783
Is now the time to reopen this issue? The thread hasn't shown any objections
against this change for _new_ branches as far as I understand.
--
Reply to this email
Issue was closed by Andrea Veri
Issue #376: https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/376
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/376
You're receiving this email because of your account on
Andrea Veri commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/376#note_882656
Thanks, closing this for now, please re-open when there's something for us to
act on, thanks!
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitLab:
Jordan Petridis commented on a discussion:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/Infrastructure/-/issues/376#note_882612
Thanks, created a discourse thread.
https://discourse.gnome.org/t/rfc-default-to-main-branch-name-for-new-repos-in-gitlab-gnome-org/3948
--
Reply to this email
Andrea Veri commented:
@alatiera I believe this should initially be discussed with the community via
desktop-devel-list. The community should agree on a default branch name and
once done we'll process the change. Want me to close the issue for now while
you reach out to a wider audience
