I, on the other hand, tried it repeatedly over a month and thought it was a
pain in the neck and change with no benefit.
Regards, Tim
-Original Message-
From: Adam Tauno Williams
Sent: 31/08/2011, 3:01 AM
To: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: Disliking gnome 3
On Wed,
When is the SweetTooth extension manager expected to be ready? This will add
*huge* benefits for Gnome 3 users.
-= Joe Pea =-
___
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
Am 30.08.2011 14:21, schrieb Rui Tiago Cação Matos:
On 30 August 2011 04:34, Ralph Hofmannhofmann2...@arcor.de wrote:
@gnome-shell developers: I think there should be a way to setup the PATH for
alt+F2.
It works for me. You can check the $PATH that gnome-shell sees with
$ strings
Am 30.08.2011 20:45, schrieb Ben Greear:
I couldn't find a better place to voice my displeasure of Gnome 3,
so I'm posting here.
I really just want gnome-2 back. Fallback mode sort of works, but its
still not as good as gnome 2 was. I do work on my computer, not just
open one or two windows
Hello everyone!
At Nova we have a service we call Customized OS: on which we create a
GNU/Linux Distro molded for specific customer's needs. As from the
arrival of G3 we have started thinking on adding to this service a
Customized Desktop Environment, since GShell loads arbitrary javascript
code
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:29 AM, D.H. Bahr db...@uci.cu wrote:
**
Hello everyone!
At Nova we have a service we call Customized OS: on which we create a
GNU/Linux Distro molded for specific customer's needs. As from the arrival
of G3 we have started thinking on adding to this service a
We would use this for changing the Information Architecture of the shell
itself.
Allow me to explain myself: our biggest client is the Public Sector
which is instructed to migrate from privative to free software thus
becoming our goal to provide a system that facilitates this process.
That is why
I understand your goal, but the Shell isn't really designed as a platform
for WMs: it's an extensible WM. I think that the approach of taking the
parts of the shell that make sense, like gjs, mutter, clutter and st/mx and
creating another WM may be the better approach. If you want to pretend that
On 08/30/2011 03:36 PM, John Stowers wrote:
Out of curiosity, are there any links to this? I'm curious to see
how folks actually use the new features productively.
The videos on gnome3.org might be a start, perhaps a little simple.
Anyway, speaking to *my* own workflow, slightly adapted
Basically a fix-up release for a couple of critical small issues found
in 3.1.90; also includes new support for asynchronous search providers.
About GNOME Shell
=
GNOME Shell provides core user interface functions for the GNOME 3
desktop, like switching to windows and launching
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:46 AM, Ralph Hofmann hofmann2...@arcor.de wrote:
I like the idea of javascript based plugins like in Firefox. I think that
could become the killer feature of Gnome3. Of course Gnome3 is far from
ready now. But is has a lot of potential. Potential discoverable by the
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
I couldn't find a better place to voice my displeasure of Gnome 3,
so I'm posting here.
I really just want gnome-2 back. Fallback mode sort of works, but its
still not as good as gnome 2 was. I do work on my
n Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Pasha R pashar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Ben Greear gree...@candelatech.com wrote:
I couldn't find a better place to voice my displeasure of Gnome 3,
so I'm posting here.
I really just want gnome-2 back. Fallback mode sort of works,
On 08/31/2011 11:46 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
n Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Pasha Rpashar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Ben Greeargree...@candelatech.com wrote:
I couldn't find a better place to voice my displeasure of Gnome 3,
so I'm posting here.
I really just
The idea of a GNOME Shell extension is to let the GNOME community
build on top of the GNOME Shell code base, to tweak, to customize, and
to prototype new GNOME features and behaviors.
GNOME Shell extensions aren't sandboxed, and sandboxing them is
fundamentally hard because shell extensions are
I use a single work-space. I tried multiple before, but it just never worked
out for me.
While you only use a single workspace G3 is going to be hard for you.
On gnome-2, I could load a system from bare metal and use it with zero tweaks
to gnome,
aside from dragging a Terminal icon
On 08/31/2011 01:53 PM, John Stowers wrote:
On gnome-2, I could load a system from bare metal and use it with zero tweaks
to gnome,
aside from dragging a Terminal icon into the top bar, maybe adding a few
applets.
Out of interest, which applets?
system monitor.
Evidently you can find
(Just a few comments on what's currently implemented)
Obviously, this website and its goals have some parallels with the
Mozila Addons site. I have been talking to their engineers and we both
decided that doing our own thing would be best for both of us. I have
been talking to them about how AMO
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:53 PM, John Stowers
john.stowers.li...@gmail.comwrote:
I use a single work-space. I tried multiple before, but it just never
worked out for me.
While you only use a single workspace G3 is going to be hard for you.
I thought this would naturally be the case, as
Of course, Linux users run unsandboxed code with arbitary capabilities
every day - applications, for example. So the security question with
GNOME Shell extensions is not how we can do the almost impossible job
of sandboxing them, but how we can build up layers of social, user
interface, and
20 matches
Mail list logo
