> "ams" == ams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
ams> everything else is simply slander, and on purpose trying to
ams> distort what actually happend.
Pot-kettle-black, is it? Fair enough. Nevertheless, what actually
happened is public record, available to anyone who wishes to look. I
st
Two weeks later and people are still talking about this. Don't we have
better ways to use our time? :)
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>False. I said exactly what I meant. It was partly false in fact
>(as Andy Tai pointed out, no decision had been made, so the process
> Yes, this is a good idea. I never used these wrappers and I do not know
> if many people have used these wrappers. Would any satisfactory users of
> such wrappers come forward to share your experience with the revsion
> library management of, say, FAI? Good strategies would be a great
> additi
First of all, the only thing I accused you of was not being nice, this
is true, and you even agree.
Second, you did not say what you meant, you wrote your self that it
was a `joke', jokes are nice to people, and are found funny; your
comment was not funny in the least.
Thirdly, I did not accuse y
Mikhael Goikhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> % revision=archzoom--devel--0--patch-300
> % cd `tla library-find $revision`/..
> % tar cf - --exclude $revision/,,patch-set --exclude $revision/,,index \
> --exclude $revision/,,index-by-name $revision | gzip -9 >$revision.tar.gz
> % du -
