Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
IIRC {\bf foo} has been deprecated in LaTeX (in favor
of \textbf{foo}) since the appearance of LaTeX2e.
Yeah? What was the reason for that? How is {\bf foo}
inferior? This is the second time today this happened,
I seem to be totally outdated... -
On Jun 11, 2014, at 3:37 PM, Emanuel Berg embe8...@student.uu.se wrote:
Stefan Monnier monn...@iro.umontreal.ca writes:
IIRC {\bf foo} has been deprecated in LaTeX (in favor
of \textbf{foo}) since the appearance of LaTeX2e.
Yeah? What was the reason for that? How is {\bf foo}
inferior?
Emanuel Berg embe8...@student.uu.se writes:
{\bf boldface} and stuff like that
I don't think I've ever been emboldened to write \bf.
A bit of \rm perhaps. :-)
--
It's a long way to the shop if you want a sausage roll.
___
gnu-emacs-sources mailing
Kevin Ryde user42_ke...@yahoo.com.au writes:
{\bf boldface} and stuff like that
I don't think I've ever been emboldened to write \bf.
A bit of \rm perhaps. :-)
Ha-ha-ha, super :)
--
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
___
This is some miscellaneous funcs I use in fill-nobreak-predicate.
The latest addition is TeX maths to prevent line breaks when a short
symbol is at the start or end of something like
$x \blah\blah y$
nobreak-fade.el
Description: application/emacs-lisp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Kevin Ryde user42_ke...@yahoo.com.au writes:
This is some miscellaneous funcs I use in
fill-nobreak-predicate. The latest addition is TeX
maths to prevent line breaks when a short symbol is
at the start or end of something like
$x \blah\blah y$
Great! I thought of that myself many times
