On 04/04/2018 04:39 PM, Luke wrote:
> On 04/04/2018 11:58 AM, KRT Listmaster wrote:
>> On 04/03/2018 05:18 PM, Luke wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I have not used QTWebengine in over a year and never ran a leak test. -
>>> If someone has the time to do this and verify there are no freedom
>>> issues, th
On 04/04/2018 11:58 AM, KRT Listmaster wrote:
> On 04/03/2018 05:18 PM, Luke wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> I have not used QTWebengine in over a year and never ran a leak test. -
>> If someone has the time to do this and verify there are no freedom
>> issues, they can be removed from the conclusion as you
Am 4. April 2018 17:58:51 MESZ schrieb KRT Listmaster
:
.
>
>I will try some newer versions of Qt5 as well as a newer version of
>QupZilla just to see if there are any differences. However, from my
>preliminary investigations, I would be willing to say that QtWebEngine
>(5.6.1) does not, by its
On 04/03/2018 05:18 PM, Luke wrote:
[...]
> I have not used QTWebengine in over a year and never ran a leak test. -
> If someone has the time to do this and verify there are no freedom
> issues, they can be removed from the conclusion as you mentioned.
>
I've been monitoring QupZilla 2.0.1 (wit
