Hi Quiliro,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:57:10 -0500
Quiliro Ordóñez quil...@congresolibre.org wrote:
I don't see where the problem is to erradicate
things that do bad such as hunger, infant death and user subjugating
software.
The problem is the attitude. I can propagate my message in a positive
On 22/08/11 09:48, Henry Jensen wrote:
Hi Quiliro,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:57:10 -0500
Quiliro Ordóñezquil...@congresolibre.org wrote:
I don't see where the problem is to erradicate
things that do bad such as hunger, infant death and user subjugating
software.
The problem is the attitude. I
Hello Quiliro,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:19:50 -0500
Quiliro Ordóñez quil...@congresolibre.org wrote:
It is OK to use the terms in a positive way but not to be distracted
from the issue of freedom. A position more according to FSF and in the
positive sense as you propose would be: Use ONLY
On 22/08/11 16:01, Henry Jensen wrote:
Hello Quiliro,
Hi :-)
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:19:50 -0500
Quiliro Ordóñezquil...@congresolibre.org wrote:
It is OK to use the terms in a positive way but not to be distracted
from the issue of freedom. A position more according to FSF and in the
At http://www.fsf.org/working-together/gang/ the FSF even endorses
FreeBSD, which is known to have proprietary software in their ports.
(personally I think, FreeBSD shouldn't be listed there. If they must
list a BSD system it should be OpenBSD, which has, in contrast to
FreeBSD, an explicit
