On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:04:04 -0500
Quiliro Ordóñez quil...@congresolibre.org wrote:
This is exactly what FSFE representatives are telling.
No. The previous expressions said there was no diference between
opensource and the Free Software movement. This expresses they are diferent.
No,
That is not my experience. Most people who made a conscious
technical decision for open source can be told that free software
is more than technical advantage, that it also include ethical values.
In fact, most people come to free software for technical reasons in the
first place. I myself
On 07/09/11 04:09, Henry Jensen wrote:
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:04:04 -0500
Quiliro Ordóñezquil...@congresolibre.org wrote:
This is exactly what FSFE representatives are telling.
No. The previous expressions said there was no diference between
opensource and the Free Software movement. This
For instance, many Android phones contain tivoized versions of Linux.
Those executables are open source
Are they, really? Few years ago, I got in touch with the OSI board
asking them whether they believed Tivoized software fit their
definition.
If you look at their
I think we should consider using the term «libre software»
wich is unambiguous.
2011/8/21 Henry Jensen hjen...@gmx.de
Hello Sam,
On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:00:22 +0200
Sam Geeraerts sam...@elmundolibre.be wrote:
In any case, it's clear that using the term free software over open
source
