Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [libreplanet-discuss] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-08 Thread André Silva
On 01/08/2017 01:06 PM, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > I guess that we could contact the KDE project and tell them the issue so > they can rethink about their move. Would you like report about it to them? it could be a good idea. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[GNU-linux-libre] Fully FOSS Tails OS

2017-01-08 Thread Kurtis Hanna
Hello, Anyone interested in helping port Tails to the linux-libre kernel? They sound receptive to the idea: https://labs.riseup.net/code/issues/5393 Kurtis

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-08 Thread André Silva
On 01/08/2017 02:48 PM, philcantor wrote: > Returning to the original topic, QT and KDE were previously using > QTWebkit. Webkit does remain fully free software, and Webkit2 is under > active development. > > It is not just a port of the core HTML/CSS rendering engine, *it is the > entire >

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] QTWebengine is nonfree

2017-01-08 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] This sounds like a big problem, but it might not be hard to fix. Could someone give