Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

Florencia Diaz writes: > We are deciding by consensus that is good call it "Arch (the GNU/Linux > distribution)", not "Arch Linux". Even Richard Stallman is agree about > it, please no more fighting between us, we are part from the same > distribution and community. +1

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

coadde writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > On 06/10/2016 12:59 AM, Luke Shumaker wrote: >> Would you be happy (not feel disrespected) if we were to write the >> following? > > Why are you saying "we"? it is your opinion, not me. You can not speak > on behalf of Parabola

Re: [GNU-linux-libre] [Dev] [libreplanet-discuss] [consensus][due: 2016-06-13]: New version for Parabola Social Contract

André Silva writes: >> I am coming to the conclusion that we should create both articles >> (consensus democracy) and (adhocracy) from our own wiki [0]. We could >> use those references as inspiration (eg. Wikipedia articles) to begin >> our version. What do you think? >>