Re: Licensing question about the BSD

2005-08-03 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Steve wrote: Drivative works of BSD'd code (derivative literary works [modulo the AFC test] under copyright law) are subject to BSD. In source code form, such derivative works are subject to BSD and only the BSD -- you simply can't modify/extend/etc. original license (unless you're the

What does the FSF advocate regarding non-free software

2005-08-03 Thread beirne
I'm thinking through my opinions about the FSF and am trying to figure something out. I know the FSF believes that free software is the correct form of licensing, but does the FSF formally advocate the elimination of copyright laws that allow for non-free software?

Re: What does the FSF advocate regarding non-free software

2005-08-03 Thread Eric Eide
beirne == beirne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: beirne I'm thinking through my opinions about the FSF and am trying to beirne figure something out. I know the FSF believes that free beirne software is the correct form of licensing, but does the FSF beirne formally

Re: What does the FSF advocate regarding non-free software

2005-08-03 Thread David Kastrup
beirne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm thinking through my opinions about the FSF and am trying to figure something out. I know the FSF believes that free software is the correct form of licensing, but does the FSF formally advocate the elimination of copyright laws that allow for non-free

Re: What does the FSF advocate regarding non-free software

2005-08-03 Thread Alexander Terekhov
beirne wrote: I'm thinking through my opinions about the FSF and am trying to figure something out. I know the FSF believes that free software is the correct form of licensing, but does the FSF formally advocate the elimination of copyright laws that allow for non-free software?

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

2005-08-03 Thread Bruce Lewis
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Drivative works of BSD'd code (derivative literary works [modulo the AFC test] under copyright law) are subject to BSD. That's really interesting. What legal jurisdiction are you in? U.S. law is different. Here, derivative works have separate

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

2005-08-03 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Bruce Lewis wrote: [...] Since the BSD license allows code to be used for any purpose, the purpose of creating a derivative work and distributing it under a different license is allowed. Use is irrelevant because as far as copyright is concerned, it is permitted per 17 USC 117 and the

$B$*Ajj$O%-%c%j%%!%^%s$N$_$G$9(B?

2005-08-03 Thread info
$B!y%*!%k%-%c%j%M!!(Bhttp://www.awg1.net/?carrier1 $B'X(B $B5U1gAjj$O%-%c%j%[EMAIL PROTECTED](B $B(87A*$7$?F/$/[EMAIL PROTECTED]!K$H5U1g4uK[EMAIL PROTECTED])(B $B(G($l$KG($l$^$/[EMAIL PROTECTED]1J5WE*$K2?;~$G$b2?=h$G$b40A4L5NA$G$NR2pCW$7$^$9!#(B $B($J$[EMAIL