All love enhancers on one portal!

___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

John Hasler wrote: [...] > I think you might get away with literally doing that without infringing the > copyright[1] with actual pieces of paper. However, their is no equivalent > for machine-readable media (except perhaps paper tape or punched > cards). It's also so impractical as to be moot.

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

David Kastrup writes: > And if you think you can circumvent the reprinting permission by taking > hold of a few cubic feet of actual copies, then cutting and pasting from > them by a mechanical process, I very much doubt that the nominal > possession of the physical copies will save you from having

Re: inhouse forking?

John Hasler wrote: [...] > No. In fact, you don't have to make your changes public even if you do > sell it: you just have to provide the to your customers. Are you GNUtian or not, Hasler? If yes, you should urgently take the FSF's license-quiz http://www.gnu.org/cgi-bin/license-quiz.cgi (Q6).

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

Alexander Terekhov wrote: [...] > SmartDownload could be analogized to a free neighborhood newspaper, > readily obtained from a sidewalk box or supermarket counter without > any exchange with a seller or vender. It is there for the taking. I hear that (plonked) GNUtian dak continues to exhibit st

Re: inhouse forking?

Thank you! ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

Re: inhouse forking?

fogelsharp writes: > If I download a software (source code, for example linux) licensed under > GPL and I change some code (for example because I dislike something) but > do not plan to sell or distribute it: I just want to use my changes on my > computer: Do I have to make my changes public anyway

Re: inhouse forking?

Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > fogelsharp wrote: > [...] >> > Google for "GPL FAQ", I think this is covered. >> >> Thank you very much! I'll read the FAQ! > > Read also Michael K. Edwards' 50+ pages of utter devastation (legal) > to the GPL FAQ. Which will become relevant if yo

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alexander Terekhov wrote: > [...] >> Gifts > > I hear that (plonked) GNUtian dak (still***) seems to be unaware that > "attached conditions" for downloads (I mean electronic distribution) > become binding only via affirmative action on part of rec

Re: inhouse forking?

fogelsharp wrote: [...] > > Google for "GPL FAQ", I think this is covered. > > Thank you very much! I'll read the FAQ! Read also Michael K. Edwards' 50+ pages of utter devastation (legal) to the GPL FAQ. Drop a note to M.K.Edwards at gmail.com at ask for a copy of "Will the Real GNU GPL Please

Re: Licensing question about the BSD

Alexander Terekhov wrote: [...] > Gifts I hear that (plonked) GNUtian dak (still***) seems to be unaware that "attached conditions" for downloads (I mean electronic distribution) become binding only via affirmative action on part of recipient. Territorial hints aside for a moment, he might (fi

Re: inhouse forking?

David Kastrup wrote: > "fogelsharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I do have a basic question about the GPL: If I download a software > > (source code, for example linux) licensed under GPL and I change some > > code (for example because I dislike something) but do not plan to sell > > or distr

Re: inhouse forking?

"fogelsharp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I do have a basic question about the GPL: If I download a software > (source code, for example linux) licensed under GPL and I change some > code (for example because I dislike something) but do not plan to sell > or distribute it: I just want to use my c

Re: inhouse forking?

You only have to distribute the changes to the people who recive a compiled version of your program. ___ Gnu-misc-discuss mailing list Gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss

inhouse forking?

Dear community I do have a basic question about the GPL: If I download a software (source code, for example linux) licensed under GPL and I change some code (for example because I dislike something) but do not plan to sell or distribute it: I just want to use my changes on my computer: Do I have to