Now, I, Evil Bill Fence Door, copyright this patch, sell it with
onerous copy protection, and for $1,000,000 a copy. The license
that comes with it prohibits re-distribution of the patch. Note
that I'm *not* re-distributing any GPL-licensed software.
But you _modified_ a GPL
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
On 2006-05-13, Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
My reply is an original work of authorship. I provided
annotations and other modifications to the message I replied
to. Therefore my reply is and only can be a derivative work.
Gordon Burditt wrote:
Now, I, Evil Bill Fence Door, copyright this patch, sell it with
onerous copy protection, and for $1,000,000 a copy. The license
that comes with it prohibits re-distribution of the patch. Note
that I'm *not* re-distributing any GPL-licensed software.
Hi all,
The following happens:
1) Source code to an executable is released under the GPL by author #1.
2) Source code is lightly modified by author #2 and then included as a
DLL bundled with a new GPL app by a author #2.
How should the copyright info be handled?
Many thanks,
J.
Jacob JKW wrote:
Hi all,
The following happens:
1) Source code to an executable is released under the GPL by author #1.
2) Source code is lightly modified by author #2 and then included as a
DLL bundled with a new GPL app by a author #2.
How should the copyright info be handled?
The following happens:
1) Source code to an executable is released under the GPL by author #1.
2) Source code is lightly modified by author #2 and then included as a
DLL bundled with a new GPL app by a author #2.
How should the copyright info be handled?
The DLL bundle must be
Merijn de Weerd wrote:
On 2006-05-14, Eric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, suppose, hypothetically, that you added a lot of code to the
kernel/base distribution, stripped out some of the base distribution
stuff (like X or whaever) too in order to create a really robust and
unique testing
Eric writes:
so its basically if i modify any gpl'd code I must give away my changes
whether or not i keep it 'in-house' ?
No.
Wow, if i have that right...
You don't. If you do not distribute your modified GPLd code you are not
required to show the source to anyone. Read the GPL. It's
