rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:38:58PM +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
were widely touted as proof of its efficacy. One of these days
someone who is anti-GPL will find it advantageous enough to finally
swat that annoyance.
You
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:38:58PM +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
were widely touted as proof of its efficacy. One of these days
someone who is anti-GPL will find it advantageous enough to finally
swat that annoyance.
You mean, like Daniel anti-GPL
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 01:38:58PM +0200, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
were widely touted as proof of its efficacy. One of these days
someone who is anti-GPL will find it advantageous enough to finally
swat that
David Kastrup writes:
Uh, you are confusing the _circumstances_ for a ruling...
Known as dicta.
...with its consequence.
Known as holding.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
