Re: gnu avl trees

2008-08-22 Thread Ben Pfaff
castironpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Success, thanks for your time. I feel that the line: > > q = (struct pavl_node *) &tree->pavl_root; > > in _4.5.2 Step 3: Update Balance Factors_ could use an explanation in > the docs, something like, 'because q.pavl_link[ 0 ] is the only > property

Re: Why GnuZilla?

2008-08-22 Thread David Kastrup
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alfred M. Szmidt writes: >> [gNewSense] only includes free documentation. > > I wrote: >> No GFDL documents with "front cover texts", "back cover texts" or >> "invariant sections"? > > Alfred M. Szmidt writes: >> Such documents are also free documents, so

Re: Why GnuZilla?

2008-08-22 Thread John Hasler
Alfred M. Szmidt writes: > [gNewSense] only includes free documentation. I wrote: > No GFDL documents with "front cover texts", "back cover texts" or > "invariant sections"? Alfred M. Szmidt writes: > Such documents are also free documents, so are verbatim only documents. Debian does not agree.

Re: Why GnuZilla?

2008-08-22 Thread Tim Smith
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Alfred M. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> [gNewSense] only includes free documentation. > >No GFDL documents with "front cover texts", "back cover texts" or >"invariant sections"? > > Such documents are also free documents, so are verbatim only

Re: Why GnuZilla?

2008-08-22 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> [gNewSense] only includes free documentation. No GFDL documents with "front cover texts", "back cover texts" or "invariant sections"? Such documents are also free documents, so are verbatim only documents. ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list

Re: Why GnuZilla?

2008-08-22 Thread John Hasler
Alfred M. Szmidt writes: > [gNewSense] only includes free documentation. No GFDL documents with "front cover texts", "back cover texts" or "invariant sections"? -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA ___ gnu-misc-discuss ma

Re: Why GnuZilla?

2008-08-22 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> It is better to use something like gNewSense, which is 100% free > software. But includes non-free documentation. Not true, it only includes free documentation. ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org

Re: gnu avl trees

2008-08-22 Thread castironpi
On Aug 21, 7:41 pm, castironpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Aug 21, 6:43 pm, castironpi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I am copying the GNU Avl Tree library in another language (Python).  I > > am adding 'up'-links, which I need for my application, and allowing > > multiple equivalen

Re: Why GnuZilla?

2008-08-22 Thread Ciaran O'Riordan
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alfred M. Szmidt writes: >> It is better to use something like gNewSense, which is 100% free >> software. > > But includes non-free documentation. The GFDL is pretty good. I wish is would be changed in certain ways, but I don't see any reason not to read

Re: Why GnuZilla?

2008-08-22 Thread John Hasler
Alfred M. Szmidt writes: > It is better to use something like gNewSense, which is 100% free > software. But includes non-free documentation. -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI USA ___ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-

Re: Why GnuZilla?

2008-08-22 Thread Yavor Doganov
В Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:22:06 -0400, Alfred M. Szmidt написа: > The main reason for GNU Icecat is because Mozilla distributes non-free > software from their site, In the tarballs too, which is why in IceCat (and other free variants like BurningDog, Iceweasel, etc.) they are removed. ___

Re: Why GnuZilla?

2008-08-22 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> In the case of GNUzilla, it is not just the absence of non-free > software, and trademark issues (the trademark issues are in either > case not important, since they can be worked around easily). GNUzilla > adds quite a few new features (you can see a small list of some at > http: