Re: SFLC's GPL court enforcement -- track record

2009-01-31 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Jet another latter from Dan Ravicher asking for delay of the pretrial conference. (from PACER) - 01/30/2009 6 ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Paul G. Gardephe from Daniel B. Ravicher dated 1/30/09 re: Counsel requests an adjournment of the pretrial conference currently scheduled for

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: The GPL is non-commercial!

2009-01-31 Thread Alexander Terekhov
WOW. - 01/30/2009 20 First MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Diebold Inc.'s FRCP 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Claim Against Diebold Inc. filed by Diebold Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 3/6/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco. (Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 1/30/2009) (Entered:

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: The GPL is non-commercial!

2009-01-31 Thread Alexander Terekhov
01/30/2009 22 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand byPremier Election Solutions. (Froyd, Jane) (Filed on 1/30/2009) (Entered: 01/30/2009) Complaint: http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvDIEBOLD/COMPLAINT.pdf Answer: -- ANSWER 1. In response to paragraph 1, Defendant is without knowledge or

Re: [ROFL] GCC's GPLv3 Updated License Exception

2009-01-31 Thread Hyman Rosen
Barry Margolin wrote: I believe the choice of library to incorporate is an original work of authorship. Linking a set of object files and libraries is analogous to creating an anthology in traditional literature. You're never going to convince a court of that - the source which makes calls

Re: Artifex v. Diebold: The GPL is non-commercial!

2009-01-31 Thread Rjack
Hyman Rosen wrote: Alexander Terekhov wrote: WOW. Huh? You're impressed by motion practice? That long stream of denials you listed in the other post is the perfectly routine response all complaints receive; it is the job of the plaintiffs to prove their case, and it is routine for the