Spamowitz Roy
http://boycott-boycottnovell.com/index.php/the-news/88-roy-schestowitz-demands-expansion-of-qgodwins-lawq
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Copyrights and wrongs
http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2010/02/08/copyrights-and-wrongs/
See comments.
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
At some point, the New York bar will have no choice but to disbar the
entire gang of utterly incompetent GNU arch legal beagles from SFLC
for consistent filing of frivolous lawsuits such as
On 2/10/2010 10:08 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
At some point, the New York bar will have no choice but to disbar the
entire gang of utterly incompetent GNU arch legal beagles from SFLC for
consistent filing of frivolous lawsuits such as
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
A compilation work which you call 'MacOSX' is a collective work (see
17 USC 101 for both 'compilation' and 'collective work') of Apple and
only Apple, silly.
Without any components
On 2/10/2010 11:30 AM, RJack wrote:
The plaintiffs chose to file automatic involuntary dismissals
The words chose and involuntary don't go together.
You appear to have ongoing difficulties with the English
language, which perhaps explains some of your difficulty
understanding the GPL and the
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
So for any component with copyrighted parts from other parties (like
BSD), Apple could not sue for breach of copyright without having the
other parties joining the suit?
Reality check...
Apple's COMPILATION WORK is NOT A
RJack u...@example.net writes:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 10:08 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
At some point, the New York bar will have no choice but to disbar
the entire gang of utterly incompetent GNU arch legal beagles from
SFLC for consistent filing of frivolous lawsuits such as
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
Apple took some BSD'd works and included that stuff in a compilation
work exclusively (C) by Apple and only Apple.
How did the copyright of BSD come to cease on the portions that Apple
changed?
BSD copyright didn't come to cease (it's too early for expiration
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
Apple took some BSD'd works and included that stuff in a compilation
work exclusively (C) by Apple and only Apple.
How did the copyright of BSD come to cease on the portions that Apple
changed?
BSD copyright didn't
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
Why would a defendant make the GPLed sources available
There's no reason to do it -- to wit:
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
To Hyman: take your meds first!
regards,
alexander.
P.S. It is just like a suit to enforce a copyright license, which
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
Why would a defendant make the GPLed sources available
There's no reason to do it -- to wit:
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
That's a link to a firmware upgrade. This firmware update is
applicable
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
BSD copyright didn't come to cease (it's too early for expiration
and I'm unaware of any abandonment/dedications to the public domain of
the BSD'd works) on the BSD'd portions that Apple changed unless
Apple's changes resulted in a complete removal of BSD'd
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
[...]
Why would a defendant make the GPLed sources available
There's no reason to do it -- to wit:
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
That's a link to a firmware upgrade.
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 10:39 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Erik Andersen's alleged (and fraudulent in fact) claim of ownership
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane In addition to
the copyright notices, McFarlane registered copyright on the issues
and the books. ...
RJack u...@example.net writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
RJack u...@example.net writes:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
The SFLC has had successful outcomes in every single case that it
has filed - all defendants have come into compliance with the
GPL. No defendant has chosen to fight the plaintiffs.
The
On 2/10/2010 1:15 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
That where to get is NOT Verizon's location and has nothing to do with
Verison's location above, silly dak.
The online distribution of GPLed firmware by Verizon is
accompanied by source found at
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Peter Köhlmann wrote:
[...]
That where to get is NOT Verizon's location and has nothing to do
with Verison's location above, silly dak.
Oh, and you twit can certainly point to the exact place in the GPL
where
RJack wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 2/10/2010 10:39 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Erik Andersen's alleged (and fraudulent in fact) claim of
ownership
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Gaiman_v._McFarlane In addition to
the copyright notices, McFarlane registered copyright on the issues
and the
On 2/10/2010 3:53 PM, RJack wrote:
37 CFR § 202.3 Registration of copyright.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a copyright claimant is either:
(i) The author of a work;
(ii) A person or organization that has obtained ownership of all rights
under the copyright initially belonging to the
19 matches
Mail list logo
