Werner Koch <w...@gnupg.org> wrote: >> Now you apparently would like to try the innovative PEP-enhanced Enigmail >> 2.1 by yourself to see all these fancy things with your own eyes, so I must >> warn you: *it mangles ~/.gnupg/gpg.conf and ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf*, so >> take precautions. > > That is okay
Well, it was not okay for me. pass(1) failed to work after that. Thanks gods, I revise my configs with git, so it was just two commands to find out the offending pieces and revert them back. Now I wonder, how probable it is, that target audience of that ‘Junior Mode’ does the same. > all frontends can do that and we even provide an interface to do this. Thanks, I’ll be on alert. > There are other choices for a MUA for example Kmail, where my associate Andre > is deeply involved in the crypto. Yes, indeed. And I actually never fully understood, why everyone still recommends a novice GPG user to deal with a couple of Thunderbird + Enigmail, where the core functionality required is implemented as an extension over an API, that becomes lamer and lamer from release to release.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
