Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi, I have a personal project to write a guidebook for Project Management.
I'd like to publish it under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Has anyone already had an experience of this kind of thing - pitfalls
to avoid, distribution, communication ?
I've
Rui writes:
However, the DFSG is flawed when used against documents. Because of a
flawed reasoning, the RFCs have been moved into non-free.
I said nothing about Debian or the DFSG. In fact, I disagree with the
current Debian policy on documents.
The GFDL has several problems. One is the
I have a personal project to write a guidebook for Project
Management. I'd like to publish it under the GNU Free
Documentation License.
The GFDL in its present form is non-free and somewhat buggy.
Please, the GFDL is not non-free, do not spread these untruths.
Thanks for the info. I've been Googling this afternoon and I did
notice a few dissuasive articles about the GFDL.
These dissuasive articles are written by people who do not
understand that documentation and software must be treated differently
because they are different. Indeed, the GNU
Mark writes:
I have a personal project to write a guidebook for Project Management.
I'd like to publish it under the GNU Free Documentation License.
The GFDL in its present form is non-free and somewhat buggy. I suggest the
GPL (yes, you _can_ use it for documents). Failing that I suggest one
John Hasler wrote:
Mark writes:
I have a personal project to write a guidebook for Project Management.
I'd like to publish it under the GNU Free Documentation License.
The GFDL in its present form is non-free and somewhat buggy. I suggest the
GPL (yes, you _can_ use it for documents).
