Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well

2010-02-23 Thread David Kastrup
Alexander Terekhov writes: > David Kastrup wrote: > [...] >> It is actually not true that it is "nur einseitig verpflichtend" since > > It's "einseitig verpflichtend" as in > > http://dejure.org/gesetze/BGB/518.html > > and > > http://vwi.andre-grahl.de/Recht/pdf/03_Script.pdf > > "Pflichtenbegr

Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well

2010-02-23 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Hey dak, just to clarify: the point was not that the GPL is somehow a unilateral contract (it's obviously a bilateral boiler plate contract form, not unilateral) but rather that even gifts are contracts under the German law. A totally gratuitous IP license IS ALSO A CONTRACT, silly dak. "Whether t

Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well

2010-02-23 Thread Alexander Terekhov
David Kastrup wrote: [...] > It is actually not true that it is "nur einseitig verpflichtend" since It's "einseitig verpflichtend" as in http://dejure.org/gesetze/BGB/518.html and http://vwi.andre-grahl.de/Recht/pdf/03_Script.pdf "Pflichtenbegründende Rechtsgeschäfte (Verpflichtungsgeschäfte

Re: Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well

2010-02-23 Thread David Kastrup
Alexander Terekhov writes: > http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenkungsvertrag > > "Die Schenkung ist ein zweiseitiges Rechtsgeschäft (ein Vertrag), aber > nur einseitig verpflichtend, weil nur der Schenker leisten muss." The GPL is not a "Schenkung" since there is no transfer of ownership. It is a

Hey Mackenzie, please help comrade dak grok the following as well

2010-02-23 Thread Alexander Terekhov
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schenkungsvertrag "Die Schenkung ist ein zweiseitiges Rechtsgeschäft (ein Vertrag), aber nur einseitig verpflichtend, weil nur der Schenker leisten muss." regards, alexander. P.S. "I'm insufficiently motivated to go set up a GNU/Linux system so that I can do the bui