On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 18:51:06 -0400
Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've heard this used as a counterargument against the claim that GPL is
a viral license (I don't use that term in a derogatory way, I thought
that was the whole point to the GPL!). However, the argument that I've
heard
I'm involved in a discussion about the GPL and dual-licensing...
situations like the Qt library where software is licensed under the GPL,
but can be licensed for a fee under different terms for usage outside
the parameters of the GPL.
I've heard this used as a counterargument
