Re: PostgreSQL, LGPL and GPL.

2006-10-20 Thread Merijn de Weerd
On 2006-10-20, Karen Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you make create a PostgreSQL database that uses PostGIS and you distribute that database, than your database (tables, stored procedures, views, etc) are GPL? No, because those tables, stored procedures etc. are not derivative works of the

Re: PostgreSQL, LGPL and GPL.

2006-10-20 Thread Alexander Terekhov
Merijn de Weerd wrote: [...] If you distribute the PostgreSQL server software linked with the PostGIS software, then you have to comply with the GPL for both parts of that derivative work. If you don't distribute any server software, you do not have to worry about what the GPL requires.

Re: PostgreSQL, LGPL and GPL.

2006-10-20 Thread John Hasler
Karen Hill writes: If you make create a PostgreSQL database that uses PostGIS and you distribute that database, than your database (tables, stored procedures, views, etc) are GPL? No. Like wise if you create a client that connects to that database, do they also become GPL? No. Does

Re: PostgreSQL, LGPL and GPL.

2006-10-20 Thread Karen Hill
John Hasler wrote: Npgsql is LGPL. It means you must release the source of Npgsql when distributing it, and if you modify Npgsql, but not have to release the source under the (L)GPL of the software that calls Npgsql functions? Pretty much, but you must provide your software in a form

Re: PostgreSQL, LGPL and GPL.

2006-10-20 Thread John Hasler
I wrote: Pretty much, but you must provide your software in a form that can be relinked. Karen Hill writes: What does that mean? What it says: read the LGPL. If you are dynamically linking you need do nothing special as you are already providing your code in linkable form. You also need not