Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[...]
Wrong. First sale is about distribution of authorized copies by their
owners. The GPL entitles your friend to make copies and he owns them.
So it does fall under first sale and only a contractual covenant can
interfere with your friend's right to
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[...]
Of course that calling someone a retard only shows your level :)
I'm calling you a retard because it's a fact: you are either being
intentionally obtuse or it is your natural and normal condition.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00174.html
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 10:50 +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[...]
Of course that calling someone a retard only shows your level :)
I'm calling you a retard because it's a fact: you are either being
intentionally obtuse or it is your natural and normal
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[...]
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2006/01/msg00174.html
So you pollute debian-legal too...
Sort of. Oh, and I'd like to share my latest posting.
To: Josh Triplett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Distriution of GPL incompatible libraries
Cc: Glenn L.
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
[...]
Let's analyse some situations:
1. You gave B to a friend
that's first sale
Right.
1.1 your friend sold B to someone else
that's first sale
Right.
1.2 your friend sold copies of B to other people (B1, B2, etc...)
that's no
