Developments...
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
One more suit:
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/dec/07/busybox/verizon.pdf
http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvVerizon/INITIAL_CONFERENCE_ORDER.pdf
I suspect that SFLC will voluntary dismiss before the deadline to
submit a written report listing
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Developments...
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
One more suit:
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/dec/07/busybox/verizon.pdf
http://www.terekhov.de/GPLvVerizon/INITIAL_CONFERENCE_ORDER.pdf
I suspect that SFLC will voluntary dismiss before the deadline to
submit a
mike3 wrote:
On Nov 24, 9:19 am, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Smith wrote:
On 2007-11-21, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The designated donee beneficiaries of the GPL are obviously all third
parties. Clearly the plaintiffs are parties to the GPL contract and
cannot be a member of the
On Nov 24, 9:19 am, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Smith wrote:
On 2007-11-21, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The designated donee beneficiaries of the GPL are obviously all third
parties. Clearly the plaintiffs are parties to the GPL contract and
cannot be a member of the class all
One more suit:
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/dec/07/busybox/verizon.pdf
Number 4.
regards,
alexander.
--
Plaintiffs copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market
value is impossible to assess
-- SOFTWARE FREEDOM LAW CENTER, INC.
On 2007-11-24, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Smith wrote:
On 2007-11-21, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The designated donee beneficiaries of the GPL are obviously all third
parties. Clearly the plaintiffs are parties to the GPL contract and
cannot be a member of the class all third
Tim Smith wrote:
On 2007-11-24, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Smith wrote:
On 2007-11-21, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The designated donee beneficiaries of the GPL are obviously all third
parties. Clearly the plaintiffs are parties to the GPL contract and
cannot be a member
Tim Smith wrote:
On 2007-11-24, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tim Smith wrote:
On 2007-11-21, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The designated donee beneficiaries of the GPL are obviously all third
parties. Clearly the plaintiffs are parties to the GPL contract and
cannot be a member of the
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
See also:
http://jmri.sourceforge.net/k/docket/158.pdf
(Artistic License is a contract)
the Court finds that Plaintiff's claim properly sounds in contract
The Court ruled in the JMRI case (supra):
Although the state claims are subject to dismissal on the merits
Tim Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2007-11-21, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The designated donee beneficiaries of the GPL are obviously all
third parties. Clearly the plaintiffs are parties to the GPL
contract and cannot be a member of the class all third parties.
Therefore the
Tim Smith wrote:
On 2007-11-21, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The designated donee beneficiaries of the GPL are obviously all third
parties. Clearly the plaintiffs are parties to the GPL contract and
cannot be a member of the class all third parties. Therefore the
plaintiffs can suffer no
On 2007-11-24, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you better hire a darn brilliant lawyer if you want to get your
punishment reduced because you consistently and from the start relied on
a business plan involving defrauding the customers and misappropriating
copyrighted material.
rjack wrote:
The designated donee beneficiaries of the GPL are obviously all third
parties. Clearly the plaintiffs are parties to the GPL contract and
cannot be a member of the class all third parties. Therefore the
plaintiffs can suffer no injury by the source code not being made
available
Arnoud Engelfriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2007-11-24, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you better hire a darn brilliant lawyer if you want to get your
punishment reduced because you consistently and from the start relied on
a business plan involving defrauding the customers and
David Kastrup wrote:
Arnoud Engelfriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2007-11-24, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you better hire a darn brilliant lawyer if you want to get your
punishment reduced because you consistently and from the start relied on
a business plan
On 2007-11-24, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arnoud Engelfriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2007-11-24, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you better hire a darn brilliant lawyer if you want to get your
punishment reduced because you consistently and from the start relied on
Arnoud Engelfriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2007-11-24, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arnoud Engelfriet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 2007-11-24, David Kastrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you better hire a darn brilliant lawyer if you want to get your
punishment reduced because
On 2007-11-21, rjack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The designated donee beneficiaries of the GPL are obviously all third
parties. Clearly the plaintiffs are parties to the GPL contract and
cannot be a member of the class all third parties. Therefore the
plaintiffs can suffer no injury by the
2nd *and* 3rd. :-)
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9048298
---
The SFLC filed lawsuits Monday on behalf of the developers of BusyBox
against High-Gain Antennas of Parker, Colorado, and Xterasys of City of
Industry, California. The lawsuits,
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
If either case filed is heard before a judge, it would be the first time
that a GPL infringement lawsuit has gone to trial in the U.S.
The SFLC will NEVER, NEVER allow their bluff to be called by going to
trial. If they did, the Court (perhaps sua sponte) would
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/nov/20/busybox/xterasys.pdf
(SFLC's COMPLAINT)
Plaintiffs copyrights are ...
LOL.
Adopted as sig.
regards,
alexander.
--
Plaintiffs copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market
value is impossible to assess
wh troll cluster-fuck!
-miles
--
Most attacks seem to take place at night, during a rainstorm, uphill,
where four map sheets join. -- Anon. British Officer in WW I
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
How is the weather in the GNU Republic today, GNUtian Bader? The sky
is green and GPL is not a contract as usual?
regards,
alexander.
--
Plaintiffs copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market
value is impossible to assess
-- SOFTWARE FREEDOM LAW
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/nov/20/busybox/xterasys.pdf
(SFLC's COMPLAINT)
Plaintiffs’ copyrights are ...
LOL.
Adopted as sig.
regards,
alexander.
--
Plaintiffs’ copyrights are unique and valuable property whose market
value is impossible to assess
On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:58:32PM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
wh troll cluster-fuck!
Just let them rejoice for a few minutes before reality sets in ;)
Rui
--
This statement is false.
Today is Setting Orange, the 33rd day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3173
+ No matter how much you do,
The SFLC has filed an infringement suit captioned “ERIK ANDERSEN, an
individual, and ROB LANDLEY, an individual v. HIGH-GAIN ANTENNAS, L.L.C.”
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/nov/20/busybox/highgainantennas.pdf
The SFLC alleged in the complaint in part:
8. Under the License,
26 matches
Mail list logo
