The FSF isn't sanctioning anything here -- the GNU project is run
independtly from it. While there might be many groups of hackers
outside of the GNU project, the GNU project as such doesn't have
anything called the "GNU assembly". To call it that, is to
misrepresent the GNU project and how the
"Alfred M. Szmidt" writes:
> There is indeed no such group in the GNU project,
There is a GNU Assembly. You may disagree with it, or wish it didn't
exist, or have complaints about its purpose or status, but it exists.
Denying this doesn't help resolve any of the issues around it.
And I really
"Alfred M. Szmidt" writes:
> Because you disagree with a message is not a reason to reject it.
> In either case, there is no such thing as a "GNU assembly",
Wow, such hypocrisy. Just because you disagree with the GNU Assembly
doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
There is indeed no such group in the GNU project, it is not mentioned
in any of the guiding documents for the GNU project, nor is it a group
that has been created in the GNU project since its inception. The
binutils as manual doesn't count.
Using language like hypocrisy is not kind.
Because you disagree with a message is not a reason to reject it. If
you wish to make a nicer atmosphear here, instead of calling for
moderators please try to ask the party to use a kinder tone, that is
far more benetifical.
In either case, there is no such thing as a "GNU assembly", it would
be
