Versa asserts joint ownership/indispensable party defense

2010-05-04 Thread Alexander Terekhov
THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (JOINT OWNERSHIP) On information and belief, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred because other third parties jointly created the alleged copyright at issue and those third parties are joint copyright owners of the alleged copyright at issue in this

Re: Versa asserts joint ownership/indispensable party defense

2010-05-04 Thread David Kastrup
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes: THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (JOINT OWNERSHIP) On information and belief, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred because other third parties jointly created the alleged copyright at issue and those third parties are joint copyright

Re: Versa asserts joint ownership/indispensable party defense

2010-05-04 Thread RJack
Alexander Terekhov wrote: THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE (JOINT OWNERSHIP) On information and belief, Defendant alleges that Plaintiffs’ claims are barred because other third parties jointly created the alleged copyright at issue and those third parties are joint copyright owners of the alleged

Re: Versa asserts joint ownership/indispensable party defense

2010-05-04 Thread Hyman Rosen
On 3/9/2010 7:17 AM, RJack wrote: Actually BusyBox is a thousand headed Hydra of derivative work - joint work compilations. After ten thousand patches BusyBox is a huge kettle of spaghetti code with fifty authors that is so entangled that even Humpty Dumpty's maintainers can never untangle it

Re: Versa asserts joint ownership/indispensable party defense

2010-05-04 Thread RJack
Hyman Rosen wrote: On 3/9/2010 7:17 AM, RJack wrote: Actually BusyBox is a thousand headed Hydra of derivative work - joint work compilations. After ten thousand patches BusyBox is a huge kettle of spaghetti code with fifty authors that is so entangled that even Humpty Dumpty's maintainers can