Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
Tell me, have there been any cases where somebody has been sued for
infringement of the GPL (whichever version), and the resolution of the
legal process has allowed him to continue infringing the GPL?
Case number 1:07-cv-11070-LTS.
On this page
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
Is RMS a socialist?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/12/cuba_does_linux/
-
Cuba has launched its own Linux variant, dubbed Nova.
The Nova project has been cooking away for the past year, and it was
formally unveiled this week at the annual International
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
Tell me, have there been any cases where somebody has been sued for
infringement of the GPL (whichever version), and the resolution of the
legal process has allowed him to continue infringing the GPL?
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
Is RMS a socialist?
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/12/cuba_does_linux/
-
Cuba has launched its own Linux variant, dubbed Nova.
The Nova project has been cooking away for the past year,
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
Tell me, have there been any cases where somebody has been sued for
infringement of the GPL (whichever version), and the resolution of the
legal process has allowed him
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
Tell me, have there been any cases where somebody has been sued for
infringement of the GPL (whichever
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
On this page
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
Verizon continues to distribute GPL'd works in binary form utterly
ignoring the GPL.
The case against Verizon
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2007/dec/07/busybox/verizon.pdf
was dismissed WITH
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
I was assuming you'd have already checked it, and would want to save
others on the newsgroup, including me, from needless work. Have you
checked it, Alex? Does the download offered on that page violate the
GPL?
Sure it does violate the GPL, Alan. Go to Verizon's
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... Verizon webserver transmitting from an Actiontec site ...]
And how that would make Verizon any less a distributor of that content
just like the Actiontec itself? You keep confusing URL redirection with
transmissions coming from Verizon's webserver. Stop being such an
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
I was assuming you'd have already checked it, and would want to save
others on the newsgroup, including me, from needless work. Have you
checked it, Alex? Does the download offered on that page
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
snip
But then, you're familiar with the details. Is there any evidence in
this case that this dismissal has allowed the defendant (Verizon) to
continue infringing the GPL?
Read on what res judicata means...
Is there any evidence in this case that this
'ten Tag, Peter!
In gnu.misc.discuss Peter K?hlmann peter.koehlm...@arcor.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
snip
But then, you're familiar with the details. Is there any evidence in
this case that this dismissal has allowed the defendant (Verizon) to
continue infringing the GPL?
Read
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... Verizon webserver transmitting from an Actiontec site ...]
And how that would make Verizon any less a distributor of that content
just like the Actiontec itself?
Because things are murky when it comes to deciding who is
responsible for making
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
I was assuming you'd have already checked it, and would want to save
others on the newsgroup, including me, from needless work. Have you
checked it, Alex? Does the download offered on that page violate the
GPL?
Sure it does violate the GPL, Alan. Go to
Hi, Alex!
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
I was assuming you'd have already checked it, and would want to save
others on the newsgroup, including me, from needless work. Have you
checked it, Alex? Does the download offered on
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
He knows just too well that Verizon is actually in compliance now, and for
that reason can distribute the binaries.
Yes, I've kind of gathered that.
Verizon. Is. Not. In. Complience. Got it now, Alan?
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
He knows just too well that Verizon is actually in compliance now, and for
that reason can distribute the binaries.
Yes, I've kind of gathered that.
Verizon. Is. Not. In. Complience. Got it now,
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... Verizon webserver transmitting from an Actiontec site ...]
And how that would make Verizon any less a distributor of that content
just like the Actiontec itself?
Because things are murky when it comes to deciding
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
Thanks, Alex!
Take off your blinders, Alan.
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
(from the complaint)
--
11. Upon information and belief, Verizon distributes to its customers
the Actiontec MI424WR wireless router (Infringing Product), which
Hi, Alex!
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Take off your blinders, Alan.
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
(from the complaint)
--
11. Upon information and belief, Verizon distributes to its customers
the
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
The actual URL for downloading is
http://download.verizon.net/webdownload/firmware/upgrades/actiontec%20gateway/4.0.16.1.56.0.10.7-MI424WR.rmt
containing the string actiontec gateway. Without discovery,
it's not
LOL
Developments!
Katzer filed an answer to the complaint (denying any wrong doing) and
countersuing JMRI for copyright infringement regarding proprietary (no
licensing involved at all) NMRA DCC Reference Manual for QSI Quantum HO
Equipped Locomotives-Version 3.0. KAM registered its copyright
In article 4995aee4.ab5bf...@web.de,
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... Verizon webserver transmitting from an Actiontec site ...]
And how that would make Verizon any less a distributor of that content
ZnU wrote:
In article 4995aee4.ab5bf...@web.de,
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... Verizon webserver transmitting from an Actiontec site ...]
And how that would make Verizon any less a
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
http://www2.verizon.net/micro/actiontec/actiontec.asp
The actual URL for downloading is
http://download.verizon.net/webdownload/firmware/upgrades/actiontec%20gateway/4.0.16.1.56.0.10.7-MI424WR.rmt
containing the string actiontec gateway.
In article 4995ce3f.2eacf...@web.de,
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
ZnU wrote:
In article 4995aee4.ab5bf...@web.de,
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[... Verizon webserver
In nyc.seminars secret...@lxny.org wrote:
via=Fred Benenson of Free Culture
We are FLOSSing Digital Foundations next weekend. We need help, and we want
to do it *together.* We need people of all levels, from the GIMP guru, to
the Ubuntu n00b to test it all.
I was there, it was great,
27 matches
Mail list logo
