blockquote
what=official NYLUG Python Workshop announcement
note=This is a regular event.
The NYLUG Python Workshop meets every other Tuesday.
edits=
From: NYLUG Announcements i...@nylug.org
To: NYLUG Announcements nylug-annou...@nylug.org
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:20:01 -0400
Rjack wrote:
7 wrote:
Rjack the stupid 1 wrote:
Microsoft and TomTom have settled their controversial patent
dispute, which included allegations that the Linux kernel infringes
on Microsoft's filesystem patents. TomTom has licensed the patents
from Microsoft, but intends to remove
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Rjack wrote:
7 wrote:
Rjack the stupid 1 wrote:
Microsoft and TomTom have settled their controversial patent
dispute, which included allegations that the Linux kernel infringes
on Microsoft's filesystem patents. TomTom has licensed the patents
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Rjack wrote:
7 wrote:
Rjack the stupid 1 wrote:
Microsoft and TomTom have settled their controversial
patent dispute, which included allegations that the Linux
kernel infringes on Microsoft's filesystem patents. TomTom
has licensed the patents from Microsoft, but
On Mar 30, 8:19 pm, Rjack u...@example.net wrote:
7 wrote:
Rjack the stupid 1 wrote:
Microsoft and TomTom have settled their controversial patent
dispute, which included allegations that the Linux kernel infringes
on Microsoft's filesystem patents. TomTom has licensed the patents
from
blockquote
what=official Free Software Foundation announcement
from=http://www.fsf.org/events/20090331newyork;
when=Richard Stallman will start speaking at 6:00 pm.
where=Cardozo Law School Moot Court, see below
rsvp=none required
food-and-drink=At 8:00 pm there will be a reception.
Phil Da Lick! wrote:
Copyright doesn't need to be registered.
This is from the United states Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit:
It provides that no action for infringement of the copyright in
any United States work shall be instituted until pre-registration
or registration of the
Phil Da Lick! wrote:
[...]
In our 'Professional' opinion? This from Professionals who filed
five consecutive copyright infringement cases for clients who had no
registered copyrights. ROFL
Copyright doesn't need to be registered.
See prerequisite for U.S. authors seeking to initiate a
(upcoming settlement in Artifex v. Diebold)
Contrast it with the SFLC-style blog settlements announced on the
verge of voluntary dismissals with no shred of evidence regarding the
stipulation of settlement on the record in the federal court.
--
Case 3:08-cv-04837-SC Document 35 Filed
Forgot to quote...
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Phil Da Lick! wrote:
[...]
In our 'Professional' opinion? This from Professionals who filed
five consecutive copyright infringement cases for clients who had no
registered copyrights. ROFL
Copyright doesn't need to be registered.
Rex Ballard wrote:
On Mar 30, 8:19 pm, Rjack u...@example.net wrote:
7 wrote:
Rjack the stupid 1 wrote:
Microsoft and TomTom have settled their controversial
patent dispute, which included allegations that the Linux
kernel infringes on Microsoft's filesystem patents. TomTom
has licensed the
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote in message
news:49d1e09a.2322b...@web.de...
SFLC's spin-doctoring:
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2009/mar/30/settled-not-over-yet/
Well, it is the duty of the generals to rally the troops at all times, even
if it is necessary to lie or to
amicus_curious wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote in message
news:49d1e09a.2322b...@web.de...
SFLC's spin-doctoring:
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/news/2009/mar/30/settled-not-over-yet/
Well, it is the duty of the generals to rally the troops at all
times, even if it is
In article gqukq6$gb...@blue.rahul.net,
c.c.ei...@xrexxmicro.usenet.us.com (Rahul Dhesi) wrote:
There are those that will argue that Tom-Tom paid a lot more than that.
But if that were so, then Microsoft as the alleged winner would be proud
to disclose the high amount and Tom-Tom, as the
Rjack wrote:
Is patent aggression (being a patent plaintiff) anything like
copyright aggression? (being a copyright plaintiff)?
Copyright aggression would be directed at the consumer. Patent
aggression is generally directed at [would-be] competitors in
protectionist ways.
In our
Rjack u...@example.net writes:
At the Software Freedom Law Center Eben Moglen should announce, At
the S.F.L.C. propaganda is our most important product.
Only if Tom-Tom really is the loser.
But what if Tom-Tom paid Microsoft only $1.00?
There are those that will argue that Tom-Tom paid a lot
16 matches
Mail list logo
