On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:57:33 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
These posts of yours are unreadable, RJ. They go on and on and on
obsessively, yet they are none of them complete and coherent. A typical
one of your posts assumes, often tacitly, something you showed in some
previous post,
Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:57:33 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
These posts of yours are unreadable, RJ. They go on and on and
on obsessively, yet they are none of them complete and coherent.
Your whining continues obsessively Alan. Since you obviously don't
understand
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack u...@example.net wrote:
Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:57:33 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
These posts of yours are unreadable, RJ. They go on and on and
on obsessively, yet they are none of them complete and coherent.
Your whining continues
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack u...@example.net wrote:
Since you obviously don't understand kill-files:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kill_file please read up on the merits
of kill-files and then implement one.
That's like saying an air raid shelter will save the anguish
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack u...@example.net wrote:
Thufir Hawat wrote:
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 07:57:33 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
These posts of yours are unreadable, RJ. They go on and on
and on obsessively, yet they are none of them complete and
coherent.
Your
Tim wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In gnu.misc.discuss Rjack u...@example.net wrote:
Since you obviously don't understand kill-files:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kill_file please read up on the
merits of kill-files and then implement one.
That's like saying an air raid shelter will save the
