Jean Louis wrote:
* Jacob Bachmeyer [2021-03-17 05:16]:
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
2. Browsers do not offer POSIX API to JS/WebAssembly for very
goodreasons.
The other issue is that it wouldn't really be an operating system, if
it runs in a web browser. Which kinda is the
* Alfred M. Szmidt [2021-03-17 16:33]:
>>What we can do in GNU in regards to new technologies considered trap,
>>as users will be lured to launch non-free software without possibility
>>to verify it is to expand or extend the LibreJS to verify Webassembly
>>
>What we can do in GNU in regards to new technologies considered trap,
>as users will be lured to launch non-free software without possibility
>to verify it is to expand or extend the LibreJS to verify Webassembly
>programs for their licenses.
>
> It is easier,
* Alfred M. Szmidt [2021-03-17 12:04]:
>What we can do in GNU in regards to new technologies considered trap,
>as users will be lured to launch non-free software without possibility
>to verify it is to expand or extend the LibreJS to verify Webassembly
>programs for their
What we can do in GNU in regards to new technologies considered trap,
as users will be lured to launch non-free software without possibility
to verify it is to expand or extend the LibreJS to verify Webassembly
programs for their licenses.
It is easier, and far more practical to
* Alfred M. Szmidt [2021-03-17 11:26]:
>In that particular example I have been checking programs that are free
>software as they are hosted on Github with free software licenses. I
>gave you hyperlinks as references, you could verify it yourself.
>
> No, I (and really, it is not
In that particular example I have been checking programs that are free
software as they are hosted on Github with free software licenses. I
gave you hyperlinks as references, you could verify it yourself.
No, I (and really, it is not about you or me here -- it is about the
casual user)
* Jacob Bachmeyer [2021-03-17 05:16]:
> Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> >2. Browsers do not offer POSIX API to JS/WebAssembly for very
> > goodreasons.
> >
> > The other issue is that it wouldn't really be an operating system, if
> > it runs in a web browser. Which kinda is the whol