Re: The anti-GNU defamatory group of Ludovic Courtès - Re: assessment of the GNU Assembly project

[Adrienne G. Thompson]

> > [...] when a woman wrote us to express
> > personally and specifically her concerns around RMS we ran her off, and
> > ran her down.
>
> If you are talking about the woman who wrote to this list back in Oct
> 2019, I was one  of the people who responded to her, and I was polite
> and respectful...
>


> Since Sep 2019 to this day, RMS has received hundreds --hundreds-- of
> private messages of support, including from women.


+1 Dora!!

Such is the level of fright that this self-righteousness cult has created.
> It's
> unsustainable and it has to stop. It _will_ stop


I disagree, however, that "It _will_ stop". The corporate-backed campaign
against RMS chooses to exploit women to throw their grenades. These women
are proxies, front[women] serving greedy corporate interests seeking to
control Free/Libre/Open-source software.

We should not give them (the proxies) legitimacy by entertaining them.

Legal action will be necessary to bring an end to the attacks.


Adrienne
--
Freedom - no pane, all gaiGN!

References:

   1. GNU C-Graph: http://www.gnu.org/software/c-graph
   2. Code Art Now: http://codeartnow.com
   3. Abertheid Campaign: http://www.abertheid.info
   4. Follow me on Twitter: @AdrienneGT 
   @GNUcgraph 
   5. Let's Link Up: https://www.linkedin.com/in/adriennegt/
   6. Knees On My Neck:
   https://twitter.com/AdrienneGT/status/1288648018783277068
   7. Rise Up for Richard Stallman: https://www.stallmansupport.org

Re: [Backtotheaugust] Re: Turning GNU into a bottom-up organization

[Adrienne G. Thompson]

On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 3:16 AM František Kučera 
wrote:

> The problem with this approach is the risk of hostile takeover. There
> are corporations (e.g. those that profit from proprietary
> software/cloud) ... that have almost unlimited
> (from our point of view) financial and developers resources – which
> allows them to bend such organization according to their needs.
>
> So if this is to have a chance of success, there must be a rigid
> (immutable) constitution which guarantees the principles in the long
> term. ...
> . Maybe they should be
> transformed into a constitutional document (while retaining the original
> meaning, of course).
>

Franta, I made suggestions, days ago, about a constitution for GNU. Let's
work on this suggestion.

Adrienne
-- 
Freedom - no pane, all gaiGN!

GNU C-Graph - http://www.gnu.org/software/c-graph
Code Art Now - http://codeartnow.com
Abertheid Campaign - http://www.abertheid.info
Follow me on Twitter @AdrienneGT @GNUcgraph
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss