On Sat, 26 Dec 2009 11:50:01 -0800 (PST), mike3 wrote: > > So what's the main argument in the post? Sounds more like just stating > opinions about Wikipedia contributors than an "argument".
Wikipedia is frequently criticized for censorship - this is often discussed in these newsgroups. I agree that censorship occurs on Wikipedia, having dealt with it myself in the past (no, not because of malware spam). I suggested that maybe the user base consists primarily of bullied students. I should have mentioned, it seems that the articles which are blocked from public editing are always topics which would appeal to/be targets for [junior]high-schoolers, like "Zac Efron", "Emo", "Jonas Brothers", "Michael Jackson", "Ass", "Fuck", "Penis", "Gay", "Tits", "Family Guy", "Rugrats", and "Spongebob" -- AzzMazta's Political Institute Verbal Diarrhea & More Washington, DC http://www.youtube.com/apinst/ _______________________________________________ gnu-misc-discuss mailing list gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
