Barry Margolin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Roger Johansson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jim Richardson wrote:
>>
>> > "freeware" and "Free Software" are not the same thing. Free Software
>> > refers to (mostly) GPL stuff. (See the FSF for details) that's all
"v4vijayakumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>I have been using "open source" and "free software" products for some
>time. I want to contribute to them but I couldn't decide between "open
>source" and "free software". I would support "open source" at this
>level, because we can see what it is doing
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Unruh wrote:
>>
>> Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >Unruh wrote:
>> >[...]
>> >> Yes, and you have made the comparison?
>>
>> >Am I claimi
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Unruh wrote:
>[...]
>> Yes, and you have made the comparison?
>Am I claiming that "that's a derivative of GPL software appearing
>under a BSD license"? You're suffering typical GNUish/SCOish syndrome.
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Unruh wrote:
>[...]
>> And exactly how does the AFC (I assume you mean Abstraction, Filtration,
>> Comparison test)
>Yes.
>> apply here?
>It used to determine if there is copyright i
Alexander Terekhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Nick Kew wrote:
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/05/30/nokia_goes_open_source/
>>
>> Nokia is to open its browser engine under a BSD license.
>>
>> The browser engine is developed with apple and based on Safari.
>> Which is in turn based o
