Alan Mackenzie wrote:
[...]
Oh, I don't know. Wallace tried to attack GPL2, but couldn't even manage
to get his pistol cocked.
Oh, we'll see.
http://scofacts.org/Wallace-IBM-61.pdf
regards,
alexander.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
Following the debate about whether Kororaa violated the GPL or not [1]
by shipping the nVidia and ATI binary drivers I started thinking about
the requirement that any code linked to GPLed code should be GPLed. The
GPL-FAQ seems pretty clear, if code is linked with a GPLed library then
the code
Obviously this can not be the way things work since it would then
be possible to force every application that links to libc to be
GPL, but still, the FAQ says that any program which uses a GPLed
library have to be GPL too.
The GNU C Library is licensed under the Lesser GNU GPL.
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2006 16:46:18 +0200:
1. http://kororaa.org/index.php?entry=entry060521-200059
Stallman should be sued for damages to the global environment and lost
productivity. Amount of time, energy, bandwidth, and other resources
spent on trying
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2006 16:46:18
+0200:
1. http://kororaa.org/index.php?entry=entry060521-200059
Stallman should be sued for damages to the global environment and lost
productivity. Amount of time, energy, bandwidth, and
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2006 21:07:34 +0200:
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
Alexander Terekhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on Tue, 23 May 2006 16:46:18
+0200:
1. http://kororaa.org/index.php?entry=entry060521-200059
Stallman should be sued for damages to the global
