The author of this mail belongs the following group:
- Ludovic Courtès
- Andreas Enge
- Carlos O’Donell
- Mark Wielaard
- Andy Wingo
They are the ones behind the gnu.tools domain, which
is not affiliated with the GNU project, but do constantly
use the phrase "The GNU Project" in a
Dear FSF,
In response to your call for input regarding the future of the FSF/GNU
relationship, Mark Wielaard posted proposals back in December on behalf
of several GNU maintainers:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-misc-discuss/2019-12/msg00026.html
To date, we have not received any
* Thompson, David [2020-01-07 15:55]:
> On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 11:33 AM Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> >
> > While I don't speak for or on behalf of the GNU project, I do
> > understand the current structure well enough such that I can speak
> > about it. As has been backed up by several people that
On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 11:33 AM Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>
> While I don't speak for or on behalf of the GNU project, I do
> understand the current structure well enough such that I can speak
> about it. As has been backed up by several people that do speak on
> behalf of the GNU project.
>
> As
On 27/12/19 10:30 pm, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Mark Wielaard [2019-12-27 10:40]:
>> As volunteers for the GNU Project we are happy that the FSF provides GNU
>> with services like fiscal sponsorship, technical infrastructure,
>> promotion, copyright assignment, and volunteer management. And we note
* Mark Wielaard [2020-01-03 13:59]:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 06:00:00PM +0100, Jean Louis wrote:
> > So when you say "as volunteers we are happy" -- which volunteers did
> > you ask to represent their views here? Did they give you consent for
> > such? What are their names exactly?
While I don't speak for or on behalf of the GNU project, I do
understand the current structure well enough such that I can speak
about it. As has been backed up by several people that do speak on
behalf of the GNU project.
As such I can speak with far better authority about the GNU project
than
Please refrain from reposting the same arguments over and over again
on this list, you've made them before already.
Please also stop pretending that you speak on the behalf of the GNU
project and GNU maintainers.
* Andrej Shadura [2020-01-02 17:31]:
> On 27/12/2019 10:39, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > As volunteers for the GNU Project we are happy that the FSF provides GNU
> > with services like fiscal sponsorship, technical infrastructure,
> > promotion, copyright assignment, and volunteer management. And we
* Samuel Thibault [2020-01-02 21:48]:
> Jean Louis, le ven. 27 déc. 2019 18:00:00 +0100, a ecrit:
> > * Mark Wielaard [2019-12-27 10:40]:
> > > To that end we have held discussions with other GNU maintainers,
> >
> > Who is "we" in particular?
>
> You can count me in.
>
> > If you are
Hi Jean,
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 06:00:00PM +0100, Jean Louis wrote:
> So when you say "as volunteers we are happy" -- which volunteers did
> you ask to represent their views here? Did they give you consent for
> such? What are their names exactly? Is that anywhere recorded?
>
> > To that end
On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 3:48 PM Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> Jean Louis, le ven. 27 déc. 2019 18:00:00 +0100, a ecrit:
> > * Mark Wielaard [2019-12-27 10:40]:
> > > To that end we have held discussions with other GNU maintainers,
> >
> > Who is "we" in particular?
>
> You can count me in.
I'm not
Samuel Thibault, le jeu. 02 janv. 2020 21:47:50 +0100, a ecrit:
> Jean Louis, le ven. 27 déc. 2019 18:00:00 +0100, a ecrit:
> > * Mark Wielaard [2019-12-27 10:40]:
> > > To that end we have held discussions with other GNU maintainers,
> >
> > Who is "we" in particular?
>
> You can count me in.
Jean Louis, le jeu. 02 janv. 2020 21:55:13 +0100, a ecrit:
> * Samuel Thibault [2020-01-02 21:48]:
> > Jean Louis, le ven. 27 déc. 2019 18:00:00 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > * Mark Wielaard [2019-12-27 10:40]:
> > > > To that end we have held discussions with other GNU maintainers,
> > >
> > > Who is
Jean Louis, le ven. 27 déc. 2019 18:00:00 +0100, a ecrit:
> * Mark Wielaard [2019-12-27 10:40]:
> > To that end we have held discussions with other GNU maintainers,
>
> Who is "we" in particular?
You can count me in.
> If you are generalizing, those statements are nothing
> but empty
* Mark Wielaard [2019-12-27 10:40]:
> As volunteers for the GNU Project we are happy that the FSF provides GNU
> with services like fiscal sponsorship, technical infrastructure,
> promotion, copyright assignment, and volunteer management. And we note
> that the FSF is looking for feedback on
On 27/12/2019 10:39, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> As volunteers for the GNU Project we are happy that the FSF provides GNU
> with services like fiscal sponsorship, technical infrastructure,
> promotion, copyright assignment, and volunteer management. And we note
> that the FSF is looking for feedback
[original mailing lists added back in; your mails make replying
difficult as they do not include the mailing list address]
nylxs writes:
> On 12/27/19 4:39 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
>> As volunteers for the GNU Project we are happy that the FSF provides GNU
>> with services like fiscal
On 12/27/19 4:39 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> As volunteers for the GNU Project we are happy that the FSF provides GNU
> with services like fiscal sponsorship, technical infrastructure,
> promotion, copyright assignment, and volunteer management. And we note
> that the FSF is looking for feedback
Please refrain from reposting the same arguments over and over again
on this list, you've made them before already.
Please also stop pretending that you speak on the behalf of the GNU
project and GNU maintainers.
As volunteers for the GNU Project we are happy that the FSF provides GNU
with services like fiscal sponsorship, technical infrastructure,
promotion, copyright assignment, and volunteer management. And we note
that the FSF is looking for feedback on this relationship going forward:
21 matches
Mail list logo
