Now for my prediction for the resolution of Software Freedom
Conservancy, Inc. v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et. al.
I predict that Judge Scheindlin will grant a Motion to Dismiss
pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(1). She will dismiss the lawsuit because
the plaintiffs lack Article III standing.
The
Hyman Rosen wrote:
[...]
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf
Under California contract law...
http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:15936
---
This is not legal advice...
As an attorney spending a great deal of time on software related IP
licensing and litigation
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/15/2010 9:43 AM, RJack wrote:
The statement . . . (a) Plaintiffs’ copyrights are unique and
valuable property whose market value is impossible to assess, . .
. automatically establishes the fact that any alleged injury is
conjectural and hypothetical. The SFLC lawyers
On 4/15/2010 11:06 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf
Under California contract law...
http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:15936
http://www.sapnakumar.org/EnfGPL.pdf
The GPL is Not a Contract
On 4/15/2010 11:12 AM, me wrote:
Tell it to the United States Supreme Court and Justice Scalia.
Fortunately, nothing the Supreme Court has said is inconsistent
with the CAFC JMRI decision.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/15/2010 9:43 AM, RJack wrote:
The statement . . . (a) Plaintiffs’ copyrights are unique and
valuable property whose market value is impossible to assess, . .
. automatically establishes the fact that any alleged injury is
conjectural and hypothetical. The SFLC lawyers
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/15/2010 11:06 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/08-1001.pdf
Under California contract law...
http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi?3:mss:15936
http://www.sapnakumar.org/EnfGPL.pdf The GPL is Not a Contract
--
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/15/2010 11:12 AM, me wrote:
Tell it to the United States Supreme Court and Justice Scalia.
Fortunately, nothing the Supreme Court has said is inconsistent with
the CAFC JMRI decision.
Also... up is down and black is white. ROFL.
Sincerely,
RJack :)
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/15/2010 12:00 PM, RJack wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
http://www.sapnakumar.org/EnfGPL.pdf The GPL is Not a Contract
-- Whether express or implied, a license is a contract 'governed
by ordinary principles of state contract law.'; McCoy v.
Mitsuboshi Cutlery,
On 4/15/2010 12:45 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Him is she, you idiot.
I am insufficiently familiar with Indian-sounding names
to determine their gender. The gender of the author has
no bearing on the validity of the work, in any case.
___
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/15/2010 12:00 PM, RJack wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
http://www.sapnakumar.org/EnfGPL.pdf The GPL is Not a
Contract
-- Whether express or implied, a license is a contract 'governed
by ordinary principles of state contract law.'; McCoy v.
Mitsuboshi Cutlery, Inc., 67.
David Kastrup wrote:
RJack u...@example.net writes:
Now for my prediction for the resolution of Software Freedom
Conservancy, Inc. v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et. al.
I predict that Judge Scheindlin will grant a Motion to Dismiss
pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 12(b)(1). She will dismiss the
On Apr 16, 2:36 am, Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com wrote:
On 4/15/2010 9:43 AM, RJack wrote:
The statement . . . (a) Plaintiffs’ copyrights are unique and valuable
property whose market value is impossible to assess, . . .
automatically establishes the fact that any alleged injury is
peterwn wrote:
On Apr 16, 2:36 am, Hyman Rosen hyro...@mail.com wrote:
On 4/15/2010 9:43 AM, RJack wrote:
The statement . . . (a) Plaintiffs’ copyrights are unique and
valuable property whose market value is impossible to assess, . .
. automatically establishes the fact that any alleged
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
RJack u...@example.net writes:
Now for my prediction for the resolution of Software Freedom
Conservancy, Inc. v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et. al.
I predict that Judge Scheindlin will grant a Motion to Dismiss
pursuant to
David Kastrup wrote:
Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de writes:
David Kastrup wrote:
RJack u...@example.net writes:
Now for my prediction for the resolution of Software Freedom
Conservancy, Inc. v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et. al.
I predict that Judge Scheindlin will grant a
On 4/15/2010 6:34 PM, RJack wrote:
The value of a nonexclusive copyright license like the GPL
is called its contractual interest.
Something like this:
http://www.mysql.com/news-and-events/sun-to-acquire-mysql.html
SANTA CLARA, CA January 16, 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. (NASDAQ: JAVA)
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/15/2010 6:34 PM, RJack wrote:
The value of a nonexclusive copyright license like the GPL
is called its contractual interest.
Something like this:
http://www.mysql.com/news-and-events/sun-to-acquire-mysql.html
SANTA CLARA, CA January 16, 2008 Sun Microsystems,
On 4/16/2010 2:30 PM, RJack wrote:
Yup. Only the author of a work of visual art
You made a blanket comment that US law does not recognize
the value of moral rights.
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/16/2010 2:30 PM, RJack wrote:
Yup. Only the author of a work of visual art
You made a blanket comment that US law does not recognize
the value of moral rights.
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/property/library/moralprimer.html
Under VARA, moral rights
On 4/16/2010 2:52 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
You made a blanket comment that US law does not recognize
the value of moral rights.
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/property/library/moralprimer.html
Under VARA, moral rights automatically vest in the author of a work of
visual
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/16/2010 2:52 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
You made a blanket comment that US law does not recognize
the value of moral rights.
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/property/library/moralprimer.html
Under VARA, moral rights automatically vest in
On 4/16/2010 3:13 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
a limited edition of 200 signed and numbered copies or fewer.
It is a bit more like moral rights of art than moral
rights of artists. They're trying to keep people from
buying the Mona Lisa and drawing a mustache on it,
but it's hard to write a
Hyman Rosen wrote:
On 4/16/2010 2:52 PM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Hyman Rosen wrote:
You made a blanket comment that US law does not recognize the
value of moral rights.
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/property/library/moralprimer.html
Under VARA, moral rights automatically vest in the author
On 4/16/2010 3:24 PM, RJack wrote:
What is exactly your goal?
To correct your incorrect statements. http://xkcd.com/386/
___
gnu-misc-discuss mailing list
gnu-misc-discuss@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-misc-discuss
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
David Kastrup wrote:
How do you make your income, if you don't mind me asking, dak?
I should think a lot more comfortably than you make friends.
I should think that you are jobless, right?
I'd think you're friendless, too, eh?
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
In gnu.misc.discuss Alexander Terekhov terek...@web.de wrote:
David Kastrup wrote:
How do you make your income, if you don't mind me asking, dak?
I should think a lot more comfortably than you make friends.
I should think that you are jobless, right?
27 matches
Mail list logo
