Re: GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts

2020-02-16 Thread Brian.Tiffin
Phil Maker wrote: > Ludovic, ..., > > Re the Social Contract I'm sure greater minds than mine have looked at > it but I feel obliged to make some sort of response of which the next > paragraph is the only > important one. > > Given the two options "I endorse" or "I do not adhere to" may I be

Re: GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts

2020-02-15 Thread Phil Maker
Final answer to the Social Contract Question from Phil Maker 1. Since I've only got two options (:-)) I choose "I do not adhere" which should be read as after a bit of investigation and time wasting that this is a very bad idea. Every rock you lift up has something under it (who, why,

Re: GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts

2020-02-15 Thread Kaz Kylheku (gnu-misc-discuss)
On 2020-02-15 10:10, Andreas Enge wrote: thanks for thinking about the options and sharing your opinion! Speaking strictly logically, a third option is not possible "If you're not with us, you're against us, comrade." You may wanna brush up on logic, there, buddy. It's quite a broad field,

Re: GNU Social Contract 1.0 - doubts

2020-02-15 Thread Andreas Enge
Hello Phil, On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 09:28:56AM +0930, Phil Maker wrote: > Given the two options "I endorse" or "I do not adhere to" may I be bold as to > choose > the third option, i.e. no thanks, not interested, neither answer is acceptable > to me. thanks for thinking about the options and