On Wed, 2014-12-03 at 02:36 +0100, Olaf Buddenhagen wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 02:43:46PM +0100, Garreau, Alexandre wrote:
I heard that on #hurdfr I think (the ???nightmare??? of pipes and the
fact GNU Hurd would be forced to follow POSIX, also that I remember
having seen
The x15 looks like a really good idea. Is the maintainer for it willing to
make it GNU code? And since it's not a drop in replacement mach, but a
derivative , how is it expected to be used with HURD. As HURD is only
usable on mach.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014, 3:11 PM Kete k...@ninthfloor.org wrote:
On 2014-12-08 18:59, Omar Radwan wrote:
since it's not a drop in replacement mach, but a
derivative , how is it expected to be used with HURD. As HURD is only
usable on mach.
It's not meant to run on Hurd:
braunr it's planned for a hurd clone
it's planned for a hurd clone
So he is planning to rewrite all the HURD interfaces and make it more POSIX
compliant? Its taken like 20 years to get HURD where it is right now. And
back then there where full time developers working on it. And you didn't
answer my other question; is he planning to
On 2014-12-08 19:24, Omar Radwan wrote:
So he is planning to rewrite all the HURD interfaces and make it more
POSIX
compliant? Its taken like 20 years to get HURD where it is right now.
And
back then there where full time developers working on it.
On that page, Braun takes it in stride:
sounds bigger plan than I thought ;-)
it is but not that much actually
If it isn't that much, why has it taken so long to make a HURD release
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014, 4:58 PM Kete k...@ninthfloor.org wrote:
On 2014-12-08 19:24, Omar Radwan wrote:
So he
