Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?

2019-09-04 Thread bendikker
Check these out also. https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/alive https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/anubis https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/archimedes https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/avl https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/ballandpaddle https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/bpel2owfn https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/ccide

Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?

2019-09-04 Thread Jean Louis
On September 4, 2019 6:08:50 AM UTC, Nala Ginrut wrote: > >I'm the author and maintainer of GNU XmlAT, I've been considering >obsolete it for years. And I'd like to add other new meaningful project >to >GNU. > >Here's a brief reason. >XmlAT was used to convert XML to s-expr as an intermediate

Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?

2019-09-04 Thread Jean Louis
On September 4, 2019 6:08:50 AM UTC, Nala Ginrut wrote: > >I'm the author and maintainer of GNU XmlAT, I've been considering >obsolete it for years. And I'd like to add other new meaningful project >to >GNU. > >Here's a brief reason. >XmlAT was used to convert XML to s-expr as an intermediate

Re: 70 inactive GNU packages to be decommis ?

2019-09-04 Thread Nala Ginrut
I'm the author and maintainer of GNU XmlAT, I've been considering obsolete it for years. And I'd like to add other new meaningful project to GNU. Here's a brief reason. XmlAT was used to convert XML to s-expr as an intermediate presentation for multiple cases. And it can be output to other