Legal topics are off-topic on gnu-system-discuss, please direct them
to the FSF which is responsible for enforcing the GNU GPL for the GNU
project: le...@fsf.org.
On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 22:50 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > git uses fundamentally different paradigm to the model on which VC
> > was designed. One of many examples of this is that it requires
> > staging changes before committing them.
>
> Maybe that is the aspect that convinced me to
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> git uses fundamentally different paradigm to the model on which VC
> was
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
There was indeed biased censorship on gnu-misc-discuss, but
we have corrected that.
nipponp...@airmail.cc wrote:
> Testing if I can post to this list, probably not since you guys censor
> everything (so that RMS can't see his supporters.)
gameonli...@redchan.it wrote:
> Why do you censor me? You censored my mails to RMS to keep him from
> considering what I have to say, now
Richard Stallman wrote:
> > Well, Iʼve tried, and the key obstacle now is that there seems to be
> nothing to fix: with either GnuPG 2.1 or GnuPG 2.2 setting:
>
> > (setq epa-pinentry-mode 'loopback) ;; for Emacs 26
> > (setq epg-pinentry-mode 'loopback) ;; for Emacs 27
>
> Please note
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Well, Iʼve tried, and the key obstacle now is that there seems to be
nothing to
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Would someone like to do the work required to get Magit included in GNU
Received.
Well, do we really need to do this test?
Adam Spiers writes:
> On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 08:51, wrote:
>> Testing if I can post to this list, probably not since you guys censor
>> everything (so that RMS can't see his supporters.)
>
> Confirming that I received this. Now please can we
On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 at 08:51, wrote:
> Testing if I can post to this list, probably not since you guys censor
> everything (so that RMS can't see his supporters.)
Confirming that I received this. Now please can we move past the
unfounded accusations of censorship?
Testing if I can post to this list, probably not since you guys censor
everything (so that RMS can't see his supporters.)
RMS: You once said that when the Administrators move in; well there goes
the neighborhood.
When you were in your youth you said things that very much angered
"normal" people, on the mailing lists (regarding birth announcements).
"Normal" people are generally men who are /lead/ by "their"
On Fri, Nov 01, 2019 at 03:01:16PM +0300, Dmitry Alexandrov wrote:
Adam Spiers wrote:
On Mon, 28 Oct 2019 at 00:12, Taylan Kammer wrote:
On 28.10.2019 00:51, Richard Stallman wrote:
I don't know how CVS handles merge conflicts, but the Emacs extension Magit is
a very nice front-end to Git
RMS:
Could you share your thoughts, if any, of why no one will sue GrSecurity
("Open Source Security" (a Pennsylvania company)) for their blatant
violation of section 6 of version 2 of the GNU General Public License?
Both regarding their GCC plugins and their Linux-Kernel patch which is a
I have a law license, I don't need to read about who has standing to
sue, and how to do so (Copyright Litigation (COPYLITG on Westlaw) is
good enough for that).
I want to know why you guys (Fsf for the GCC plugins, and various kernel
copyright holders for the kernel patch) will not sue
On my programming laptop, my entire disk is LUKS encrypted and has been
since ~2005. Debian (and now Devuan (no systemd)) made it easy.
You do have to type in a password on boot, 20+ characters long
naturally. The longer the better, the more convoluted, the more
insane... the way to go.
Why do you censor me? You censored my mails to RMS to keep him from
considering what I have to say, now you censor me from this list?
Yes, it was.
On 2019-10-31 19:10, Jean Louis wrote:
* Alfred M. Szmidt [2019-10-31 20:01]:
We're discussing this now with rms and the FSF.
As far as why things are the way they are today, I can't answer
that.
It dates back to a different time of ITS and PDP-10s . Just like
when
I tried to send this to the list, but it was dropped as "spam", which is
no surprise since the some want to screen communications to RMS and thus
control him.
RMS:
Could you share your thoughts, if any, of why no one will sue GrSecurity
("Open Source Security" (a Pennsylvania company)) for
Legal topics like licenses violations are not suitable for this list,
please take it either with legal@ or RMS directly. This list is for
technical disucssions that pertain to the GNU system, please lets keep
it like that.
Why do you censor me? You censored my mails to RMS to keep him from
considering what I have to say, now you censor me from this list?
As was mentioned in private, but to mention it to list members: Nobody
is censoring this list. The list moderation here has always been very
lax.
Right
21 matches
Mail list logo
