Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)?

2019-11-05 Thread gameonlinux
I am a lawyer. GrSecurity is violating section 6 of version 2 of the GPL, which is the license in question. GrSecurity does not have an independent right to create nor distribute non-separable derivative works of the Work(s) in question. By default they have NO right to do so. The copyright

Re: Will RMS be back to Programming now?

2019-11-05 Thread gameonlinux
There is importance in the practice of software: the creation there-of. RMS' clout came from the software work he did. Also programming is fun. Clout is lost when one moves to far from the corpus of it all. People say "well he USED to be a programmer". People hold programmers in higher regard

Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts

2019-11-05 Thread Richard Stallman
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]] > Whatever it is, you absolutely do not need to deal with > awkwardness of git

Re: Magnesium (was: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto)

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Jean Louis wrote: > * Alexandre François Garreau [2019-11-06 00:05]: >> What’s taking magnesium? orally? what does it do? > > Physical relaxing is helped with magnesium. You may take it as you like, and > if not orally, how else did you imagine takin' it? In injections? I believe, magnesium

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Alexandre François Garreau wrote: > Also its name is FSF and not FSF North-America. Yes, a very American thing to do. :-) > To me sister organisations were more like local department/filials (like for > a multinational company). No, not at all. They are completely independent. And that

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Alexandre François Garreau
Le mercredi 6 novembre 2019 00:00:39 CET, vous avez écrit : > * Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-11-05 19:58]: > > Alexandre François Garreau wrote: > > > [0] within the current state of affairs, and FSF long having been on > > > lower freedom and moral standards than GNU> > > Could

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Jean Louis
* Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-11-05 19:58]: > Alexandre François Garreau wrote: > > [0] within the current state of affairs, and FSF long having been on lower > > freedom and moral standards than GNU > > Could you please elaborate this. Good that you ask him Dmitry, as

Re: Will RMS be back to Programming now?

2019-11-05 Thread Jean Louis
* Nala Ginrut [2019-11-05 17:03]: > > Seriously, if RMS can do some small coding work with existing GNU packages > occasionally, > maybe it's a good chance for advocating the package. > The famous people attracts more eyes, even if some people don't like > him. > But I'm not sure if his

Re: “Free Software should be community developed” (was: (Really) Free Software future)

2019-11-05 Thread Alexandre François Garreau
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019, 21:32:45 CET Dmitry Alexandrov a écrit : > wrote: > > Free Software should be community developed. There is no problem for > > companies to contribute but they absolutely should not be the the driven > > factor. > Iʼm afraid, implementing that maxim would undermine the

Re: “Free Software should be community developed” (was: (Really) Free Software future)

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
wrote: > Free Software should be community developed. There is no problem for > companies to contribute but they absolutely should not be the the driven > factor. Iʼm afraid, implementing that maxim would undermine the goal of the free software movement, which is to make _all_ software free

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Alexandre François Garreau
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019 21:08:45 CET, vous avez écrit : > Alexandre François Garreau wrote: > > there are other stuff such as “commercial-like” software-advertisement > > advertisement related to most occidental festivities like St-Valentine, > > Christmass, Halloween, etc. (or even to some

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Alexandre François Garreau wrote: > there are other stuff such as “commercial-like” software-advertisement > advertisement related to most occidental festivities like St-Valentine, > Christmass, Halloween, etc. (or even to some extent simili-religious > rethorics like Windows 7 Sins that

Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts

2019-11-05 Thread Paul Smith
On Mon, 2019-11-04 at 22:14 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote: > However, it meant that my simple recipe for committing my changes > did not work. Without knowing what your recipe tries to do or what did not work about it, we cannot comment. Anyway, it doesn't seem that you're looking for help with

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Alexandre François Garreau
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019 19:58:00 CET, vous avez écrit : > Alexandre François Garreau wrote: > > [0] within the current state of affairs, and FSF long having been on lower > > freedom and moral standards than GNU > Could you please elaborate this. For instance I heard about “a day without DRM”

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Alexandre François Garreau wrote: > [0] within the current state of affairs, and FSF long having been on lower > freedom and moral standards than GNU Could you please elaborate this. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Alexandre François Garreau
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019 04:09:45 CET, vous avez écrit : > > Purism do not respect users’ freedom: > > https://libreboot.org/faq.html#will-the-purism-laptops-be-supported > That statement is true at one level, unfair at another level. > This is not entirely satisfactory, I agree. But it

Re: puri.sm

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Alexandre François Garreau wrote: > Le mardi 5 novembre 2019 11:49:53 CET, vous avez écrit : >> I see the context of your letter and aware of certain deceptive marketing >> practices that had been used by puri.sm. However, out of the context that >> claim looks glaringly unfair. > > What

Re: puri.sm (was: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto)

2019-11-05 Thread Alexandre François Garreau
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019 11:49:53 CET, vous avez écrit : > I see the context of your letter and aware of certain deceptive marketing > practices that had been used by puri.sm. However, out of the context that > claim looks glaringly unfair. What context exactly? That might has been wrongly

Reviving GTK1 (and 2)

2019-11-05 Thread Alexandre François Garreau
I really much like the idea that free software allows to keep or even revive old version, and really dislike the modern trend of “keeping *updated*”, with the exceptional care about security (well-done and simple programs like TeX can avoid update and stay secure and bug-less by being simple

Proposal: More GTK1 (and 2) programs. (Reviving use of these libraries in free systems, for efficiency and avoidance of lock-in)

2019-11-05 Thread gameonlinux
It has been noted that GTK1 and GTK2 were the GIMP ToolKit and were fairly efficient, and allowed the creation of programs that could run on a wide variety of hardware; however GTK3 is Gnome*'s ToolKit. GTK1 was lightweight, and fairly straight forward, and was built by the GIMP hackers. GTK2

Re: Will RMS be back to Programming now?

2019-11-05 Thread Nala Ginrut
Seriously, if RMS can do some small coding work with existing GNU packages occasionally, maybe it's a good chance for advocating the package. The famous people attracts more eyes, even if some people don't like him. But I'm not sure if his current status is suitable for that advocating work.

Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)?

2019-11-05 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 31/10/19 20:23, gameonli...@redchan.it wrote: > RMS: > Could you share your thoughts, if any, of why no one will sue GrSecurity > ("Open Source Security" (a Pennsylvania company)) for their blatant > violation of section 6 of version 2 of the GNU General Public License? > > Both regarding

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) wrote: > Please keep discussions related to technical issues about the GNU system, > non-free platforms are entierly off-topic for this list. Please note, @gameonli...@redchan.it sent his letter to two m/l: gnu-system-discuss@gnu.org and

Re: puri.sm (was: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto)

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Alexandre François Garreau wrote: > Le lundi 4 novembre 2019, 14:51:08 CET Jean Louis a écrit : >> * gameonli...@redchan.it [2019-11-04 14:05]: >> Look here how Purism, company behind the PureOS, one of the FSF endorsed >> fully free system distributions is disabling the Intel management

Re: Making git as easy as CVS, for handling merge conflicts

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
Richard Stallman wrote: > Adam Spiers wrote: > > git uses fundamentally different paradigm to the model on which VC was > designed. One of many examples of this is that it requires staging changes > before committing them. > > Maybe that is the aspect that convinced me to give up on using

Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)?

2019-11-05 Thread Dmitry Alexandrov
John Sullivan wrote: > a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > >> Legal topics are off-topic on gnu-system-discuss, please direct them to the >> FSF which is responsible for enforcing the GNU GPL for the GNU project: >> le...@fsf.org. > > Actually licens...@fsf.org please Which is not a

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Jean Louis
* Florian Weimer [2019-11-05 09:08]: > * nipponmail: > > > Getting GNU/Linux onto a laptop these days is quite the difficulty if > > you don't know what you're doing because of Secure Boot. It's not a plug > > and play thing like once it was. Probably discourages alot of users. > > Sure, and

Re: Why don't gnu.org and RMS sign mail? - FDE Crypto

2019-11-05 Thread Florian Weimer
* nipponmail: > Getting GNU/Linux onto a laptop these days is quite the difficulty if > you don't know what you're doing because of Secure Boot. It's not a plug > and play thing like once it was. Probably discourages alot of users. Sure, and that was totally predictable. But what can we do