[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
This isn't really the right place to discuss out opinions of Microsoft.
--
Dr
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Please forgive my ignorance, but what's wrong exactly in licensing
> under
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
Most of the packages on GitHub are not free software (or open source)
because they
On Thu, 28 Nov 2019 14:32:54 +0100
inasprecali wrote:
> Please forgive my ignorance, but what's wrong exactly in licensing
> under only a single version of the GPL?
https://www.gnu.org/licenses/identify-licenses-clearly.html
--
Félicien Pillot
2C7C ACC0 FBDB ADBA E7BC 50D9 043C D143 6C87
nipponm...@firemail.cc writes:
> Github is "software development as social media".
> Thus all you have is backbiting and gossip as 90% of the "development".
> Additionally Microsoft encouraged the additions of additional writings
> alongside the licenses such as "Codes of Conduct."
>
> So now