On 2019-11-06 21:56, Ian Bentley wrote:
I am subscribed to this list to keep abreast of the system discussion,
not vitreous ranting. Take it elsewhere.
From The Collaborative International Dictionary of English v.0.48
[gcide]:
Vitreous \Vit"re*ous\, a. [L. vitreous, from vitrum glass;
I’m pretty much sure the old religions, especially some popular
branches of
Islam and Christianism condemn what you say about women.
You're wrong.
Islam explicitly allows men to marry female children.
Bukari Hadith book 5
Sahih Bukhari 5:58:236
Sahih Bukhari 7:62:64
Sahih Bukhari 8:73:151
* gameonli...@redchan.it [2019-11-07 05:18]:
> The man is no[w] a eunich is what I ment to type. I did type it later in the
> post. My definition is the anti-american definition.
GNU project is about free software and is welcoming everybody. Please
respect people.
> Men are men. Women are
* gameonli...@redchan.it [2019-11-07 03:22]:
> Why did you edit my words of he (the libreboot maintain is a man: who had
Those types of descriptions of people's bodies are not subject of GNU
project. That is hurting those who are going difficult times, even if
they don't, mentioning somebody's
Pure cissexism is off-topic on gnu-system-discuss, which is about technical
aspects of the GNU system. You shall not talk about social or politics (other
than software freedom) here. For further questions please ask in private.
Le mercredi 6 novembre 2019 22:49:07 CET, vous avez écrit :
> Why
Ok seriously, this shit has gone too far.
I follow this mailing list for gnu system related conversation. This is
wildly inappropriate, offensive and it should not continue. There are other
venues for such conversations surely.
I am subscribed to this list to keep abreast of the system
Why did you edit my words of he (the libreboot maintain is a man: who
had his genitals sliced off) to [she]? I did not authorize you do do
that. Verbatim quotes are fine, changing words is not. The man is no a
eunich, but he is not a woman (since he cannot have children). A woman
without a
