So much about security on CloudFlare:
https://www.reddit.com/r/sysadmin/comments/5vu3yn/cloudbleed_seceurity_bug_cloudflare_reverse/
and https://github.com/pirate/sites-using-cloudflare
Jean
On Tue, 2017-02-28 at 06:18 +0500, Anonymous wrote:
> Your use of the word "apply" here is equivocal (a logical fallacy).
On Fri, 2017-03-03 at 19:06 +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> We've seen heavy use of logical fallacy from you (false
> analogy, position statements with no attempt at supporting
Mike Gerwitz said:
> >> In the early days of GNU, you'd request a physical copy via mail.
> >
> > That wasn't discriminatory. They didn't say liberals had to go
> > through those hoops, while registered republicans could download
> > it, for example.
>
> That's not a proper comparison.
It's
Please refrain from such language on this list or you will be blocked.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Of course it does. It's already been established that "stopping"
> someone
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> We speak of hosting service. It is very realistic to put GNU software
> on GNU
brandon said:
> > > This is a bunk argument. If, for example, a server is set up to
> > > deny you access to files because you don't have an account and,
> > > thus, you cannot download them with wget, the server is not
> > > denying freedom 0 to you.
> >
> > GNU wget is equipped with httppost
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 09:53:00PM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> > Indeed, and we are not required to make it work for everyone.
>
> You've misunderstood the problem. It's not that GNU Radio Foundation,
> Inc. is not taking actions to make something work, it's that GRFI has
> taken actions to
Alfred M. Szmidt said:
>That it works on your side, it means not it works on someone's
>else side.
>
> Indeed, and we are not required to make it work for everyone.
You've misunderstood the problem. It's not that GNU Radio Foundation,
Inc. is not taking actions to make something work,
> 2017-03-09 09:49:16 (4.04 MB/s) - âgnuradio-3.7.10.1.tar.gzâ saved
> [4272430/4272430]
That it works on your side, it means not it works on someone's else
side.
Indeed, and we are not required to make it work for everyone. But as
it happens, it does work, so any claims to
On Wed, 2017-03-08 at 22:53 +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
> It's in fact that separate issue that has been under discussion here.
> To date, there has been no claim or discussion over whether the use of
> the GNU Radio application is restricted. That's not a point of
> contention. GNU Radio
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 04:03:34AM -0500, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>GNU Radio Foundation, Inc. is denying freedom 0 to GNU wget users.
>The only GNU Radio users being denied freedom 0 are those who are
>also GNU wget users.
>
> 1) GNU wget users are not being "denied" access to GNU
Dr. Stallman said:
> It appears we are having a misunderstanding. I can't see anything
> here that stops you from running GNU Radio however you wish.
> Whatever gnuradio.org does is a separate issue
> from using the program GNU Radio itself.
It's in fact that separate issue that has been under
Svetlana Tkachenko said:
> > > The software freedom principles apply to software only, not to
> > > organisations.
> > Principles (of any kind) are only endorsed or condemned by people
> > and organizations. An object or data (software) cannot reason
> > [...]
> That's what authorship is for.
Dr. Stallman said:
> > > You have misunderstood freedom 0. Freedom 0 means the program
> > > does not impose limits on how you are allowed to use it.
> > > Whether it does what you want in any given situation is
> > > another question.
>
> > You might want to change the language of
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > You have misunderstood freedom 0. Freedom 0 means the program does
> > not
The GNU Radio foundation isn't stopping anyone from downloading GNU
Radio.
scenario 2) GCC is inherently capable of Lisp compilation because
all the working machinery for that is already there for
whatever reason. But there is a line of code saying "if
Dr. Stallman said:
> You have misunderstood freedom 0. Freedom 0 means the program does
> not impose limits on how you are allowed to use it. Whether it does
> what you want in any given situation is another question.
You might want to change the language of freedom 0 to match what
you're
18 matches
Mail list logo
