Jean Louis wrote:
> * Alexandre François Garreau [2019-11-06 00:05]:
>> What’s taking magnesium? orally? what does it do?
>
> Physical relaxing is helped with magnesium. You may take it as you like, and
> if not orally, how else did you imagine takin' it?
In injections? I believe, magnesium
Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
> Also its name is FSF and not FSF North-America.
Yes, a very American thing to do. :-)
> To me sister organisations were more like local department/filials (like for
> a multinational company).
No, not at all. They are completely independent. And that
Le mercredi 6 novembre 2019 00:00:39 CET, vous avez écrit :
> * Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-11-05 19:58]:
> > Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
> > > [0] within the current state of affairs, and FSF long having been on
> > > lower freedom and moral standards than GNU>
> > Could
* Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> [2019-11-05 19:58]:
> Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
> > [0] within the current state of affairs, and FSF long having been on lower
> > freedom and moral standards than GNU
>
> Could you please elaborate this.
Good that you ask him Dmitry, as
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019 21:08:45 CET, vous avez écrit :
> Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
> > there are other stuff such as “commercial-like” software-advertisement
> > advertisement related to most occidental festivities like St-Valentine,
> > Christmass, Halloween, etc. (or even to some
Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
> there are other stuff such as “commercial-like” software-advertisement
> advertisement related to most occidental festivities like St-Valentine,
> Christmass, Halloween, etc. (or even to some extent simili-religious
> rethorics like Windows 7 Sins that
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019 19:58:00 CET, vous avez écrit :
> Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
> > [0] within the current state of affairs, and FSF long having been on lower
> > freedom and moral standards than GNU
> Could you please elaborate this.
For instance I heard about “a day without DRM”
Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
> [0] within the current state of affairs, and FSF long having been on lower
> freedom and moral standards than GNU
Could you please elaborate this.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019 04:09:45 CET, vous avez écrit :
> > Purism do not respect users’ freedom:
> > https://libreboot.org/faq.html#will-the-purism-laptops-be-supported
> That statement is true at one level, unfair at another level.
> This is not entirely satisfactory, I agree. But it
Le mardi 5 novembre 2019 11:49:53 CET, vous avez écrit :
> I see the context of your letter and aware of certain deceptive marketing
> practices that had been used by puri.sm. However, out of the context that
> claim looks glaringly unfair.
What context exactly? That might has been wrongly
a...@gnu.org (Alfred M. Szmidt) wrote:
> Please keep discussions related to technical issues about the GNU system,
> non-free platforms are entierly off-topic for this list.
Please note, @gameonli...@redchan.it sent his letter to two m/l:
gnu-system-discuss@gnu.org and
Alexandre François Garreau wrote:
> Le lundi 4 novembre 2019, 14:51:08 CET Jean Louis a écrit :
>> * gameonli...@redchan.it [2019-11-04 14:05]:
>> Look here how Purism, company behind the PureOS, one of the FSF endorsed
>> fully free system distributions is disabling the Intel management
* Florian Weimer [2019-11-05 09:08]:
> * nipponmail:
>
> > Getting GNU/Linux onto a laptop these days is quite the difficulty if
> > you don't know what you're doing because of Secure Boot. It's not a plug
> > and play thing like once it was. Probably discourages alot of users.
>
> Sure, and
* nipponmail:
> Getting GNU/Linux onto a laptop these days is quite the difficulty if
> you don't know what you're doing because of Secure Boot. It's not a plug
> and play thing like once it was. Probably discourages alot of users.
Sure, and that was totally predictable. But what can we do
Getting GNU/Linux onto a laptop these days is quite the difficulty if
you don't know what you're doing because of Secure Boot. It's not a plug
and play thing like once it was. Probably discourages alot of users.
Linux doesn't have any security after GrSecurity went proprietary
(something that
I was describing the steps one needs to go through to get a Gnu/Linux
system installed on a laptop. I did it a month or two ago. It's not as
easy as it was in the past because of secure boot. You must use the
pre-installed OS to disable the secure boot: you _cannot_ do it from the
bios.
On
* Jean Louis:
> * gameonli...@redchan.it [2019-11-04 14:05]:
>> Windows is required to disable the trusted computing locks in Most new
>> laptops. Other than windows there are only a few signed operating systems
>> that can be installed without disabling said locks, and they are signed by
>>
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Purism do not respect users’ freedom:
Please keep discussions related to technical issues about the GNU
system, non-free platforms are entierly off-topic for this list.
And in general, all GNU lists. :-)
Windows is required to disable the trusted computing locks in Most new
laptops. Other than windows there are only a few signed operating
systems that can be installed without disabling said locks, and they are
signed by microsoft.
I am an American. (Also an Attorney, and a programmer)
The
Windows is required to disable the trusted computing locks in Most new
laptops. Other than windows there are only a few signed operating
systems that can be installed without disabling said locks, and they are
signed by microsoft.
I am an American. (Also an Attorney, and a programmer)
The
Debian / Devuan installation is very quick and straight-forward, and the
package "vrms" (inspired by rms) allows one to check if one has non-free
packages. You can set up the full disk encryption off the bat there.
(I like Devuan for it's non-systemd options: that way you can strip the
system
* gameonli...@redchan.it [2019-11-04 14:05]:
> Windows is required to disable the trusted computing locks in Most new
> laptops. Other than windows there are only a few signed operating systems
> that can be installed without disabling said locks, and they are signed by
> microsoft.
That is sad
* gameonli...@redchan.it [2019-11-04 12:25]:
> Debian / Devuan installation is very quick and straight-forward, and the
> package vrms (inspired by rms) allows one to check if one has non-free
> packages. You can set up the full disk encryption off the bat there.
In Hyperbola GNU/Linux-libre
24 matches
Mail list logo
