Mike Gerwitz <m...@gnu.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2019 at 19:51:04 +0200, Richard Stallman wrote: >> Testing new mail server. > > This email is not legitimate---it did not originate from rms. The headers > indicate it comes from the same host that attempted to imitate bill-auger on > gnu-linux-libre list. > > I'll forward to the appropriate people. This is a significant problem.
This made me extremely curious: why does neither gnu.org sign mail server-side with DKIM, nor RMS sign his own with GPG? Is there any idea behind it?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature