Alexandre Oliva lxol...@fsfla.org writes:
Also, would it be possible to have them on ftp.gnu.org as well?
Sure, as soon as some convenient way to upload to ftp.gnu.org is
available. The current upload procedure to ftp.gnu.org just doesn't fit
the size, frequency and automation we depend on,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi,
Richard Stallman r...@gnu.org skribis:
Yes, I ll do that. Technically though, Linux-Libre is a set of scripts
that touch .c files.
[...]
Please point at those sources to get the .h files.
Looking at
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Actually, each user as a forest of symlinks under ~/.nix-profile
pointing to packages installed by the user.
So in the above example, you would typically have $HOME/.nix-profile/lib
in $LIBRARY_PATH, and you would link against libfoo from there, and the
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
How does that sound? :-)
Great, I'd love to use a technically appealing GNU-approved distro. The
issue I identified early on with the NixOS ideas is how to deal with
security upgrades. IIRC, the old response was that this is an open
issue and further
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
All in all, from experience with NixOS, while security upgrades are more
demanding on Nix-based systems, they are not much of an issue in
practice.
Thanks for explaining. However I don't see how a locally built binary
would fit into this? They would
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[2] https://gitorious.org/guix/guix/blobs/master/distro/packages/base.scm
Any particular reason it uses kernel.org Linux instead of Linux libre?
/Simon
