Alfred M. Szmidt said:
>That is lack of police at the GNU project.
>
> That is a good thing.
It's only a good thing when police are not needed.
I also think Jean Louis was using "police" loosely, perhaps to also
mean lack of /legislators/ using feedback to make adjustments when
shit
brandon said:
> > > This is a bunk argument. If, for example, a server is set up to
> > > deny you access to files because you don't have an account and,
> > > thus, you cannot download them with wget, the server is not
> > > denying freedom 0 to you.
> >
> > GNU wget is equipped with httppost
Alfred M. Szmidt said:
>That it works on your side, it means not it works on someone's
>else side.
>
> Indeed, and we are not required to make it work for everyone.
You've misunderstood the problem. It's not that GNU Radio Foundation,
Inc. is not taking actions to make something work,
Dr. Stallman said:
> The fact that some other browsers have trouble is unfortunate. But
> since our recommended free browser works ok, my conclusion is that
> this doesn't rise to the level of an ethical problem.
To be clear, I think you are speaking strictly in terms of free
software ethics.
Alfred M. Szmidt said:
> There is no "denial of service" going on,
This is yet another unsubstantiated position statement. The proof of
the DoS has been posted several times now in a variety of
circumstances.
You've been told this 3 times before. Please stop with the empty
position
Svetlana Tkachenko said:
> > > The software freedom principles apply to software only, not to
> > > organisations.
> > Principles (of any kind) are only endorsed or condemned by people
> > and organizations. An object or data (software) cannot reason
> > [...]
> That's what authorship is for.
Dr. Stallman said:
> > > You have misunderstood freedom 0. Freedom 0 means the program
> > > does not impose limits on how you are allowed to use it.
> > > Whether it does what you want in any given situation is
> > > another question.
>
> > You might want to change the language of
Mike Gerwitz said:
> >> In the early days of GNU, you'd request a physical copy via mail.
> >
> > That wasn't discriminatory. They didn't say liberals had to go
> > through those hoops, while registered republicans could download
> > it, for example.
>
> That's not a proper comparison.
It's
Jean Louis said:
> Each package may be copied to GNU and distributed in parallel from
> GNU servers by GNU helpers and problem could be solved.
We cannot forget that many projects have documentation outside of the
distributed package; documentation that is official and served only
from the
Dr. Stallman said:
> It appears we are having a misunderstanding. I can't see anything
> here that stops you from running GNU Radio however you wish.
> Whatever gnuradio.org does is a separate issue
> from using the program GNU Radio itself.
It's in fact that separate issue that has been under
Alfred M. Szmidt said:
> Works for Me.
>
> ~ $ wget http://gnuradio.org/releases/gnuradio/gnuradio-3.7.10.1.tar.gz
If you use wget in the manner required by CloudFlare, Inc. and GNU
Radio Foundation, Inc., indeed there is no issue.
But some of whome embrace freedom 0 don't want to be forced
Alfred M. Szmidt said:
> I suggest you go and visit the actual GNU Radio page, which is fully
> usable in Lynx for example. You can also browse the manual directly
> by building GNU radio.
>
> http://gnuradio.org/doc/doxygen/page_exploring_gnuradio.html
You've obviously missed some posts.
12 matches
Mail list logo
