On Friday 12 February 2010, Phil Longstaff wrote:
Author: plongstaff
Date: 2010-02-12 12:45:59 -0500 (Fri, 12 Feb 2010)
New Revision: 18644
Trac: http://svn.gnucash.org/trac/changeset/18644
Modified:
gnucash/trunk/src/backend/sql/gnc-backend-sql.h
Log:
Fix comment close
Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 schrieb J. Alex Aycinena:
Christian,
I was thinking after sending this, should it be applied to both trunk and
2.3.9?
I guess you mean 2.2.9, the 2.2-branch? No, we won't make any further 2.2.x
release, so we also don't need to apply any patch to that.
Am Freitag, 12. Februar 2010 schrieb J. Alex Aycinena:
Christian,
I attach a patchfile that corrects two problems with taxtxf.scm:
Applied to trunk (will be in 2.3.9 once it is released). Thanks a lot!
By the way, patches in bugzilla are IMHO somewhat easier to handle because for
patches in
On Friday 12 February 2010, Tommy Trussell wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Geert Janssens
janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On Wednesday 10 February 2010, Derek Atkins wrote:
Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be writes:
I'm not aware of this focus issue in the register. What
I was looking into this bug that seemed a fairly trivial to fix:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=343727
That is, if some consensus can be reached on what type the currency should be
from a qof point of view. The op proposed QOF_TYPE_STRING, although Derek
wasn't fully convinced. And
I clicked on the link on http://www.gnucash.org/ for the latest stable
version of gnucash for Windows, which is advertised as v2.2.9 and downloaded
it. The file downloaded was v2.3.3. I have been running it but it has
appeared with a message that it is not a stable build.
I have recently
The has been some discussion in the user forum at
http://n4.nabble.com/New-Transaction-field-in-the-register-td1476778.html#a1476778
about patch r18428. IMHO this patch is particularly bad and should be
removed for two reasons.
Firstly, in double line register display mode, the two dates
On Saturday 13 February 2010, Anne Lawrence wrote:
I clicked on the link on http://www.gnucash.org/ for the latest stable
version of gnucash for Windows, which is advertised as v2.2.9 and
downloaded it. The file downloaded was v2.3.3. I have been running it
but it has appeared with a
I have to strongly second this request. In my opinion, this is a
half-complete feature.
At a minimum, until there is a preference setting available, in my
opinion, this should not be part of the trunk.
Arguably, until sorting and searching is also available on the new
field, similar to the
On 02/13/2010 06:45 AM, Kim Wood wrote:
[...]
Am I alone in thinking that the register in double line mode now looks less
user friendly?
I'm not a developer but I agree with you completely.
--
Volker Englisch
mailto:vol...@englisch.us
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
