With r23444 I have squashed the last failing tests I ran into with
guile 2 and auto-compilation enabled.
I am aware that our tests don't cover the full source code, so there
may still be guile 2 related bugs lurking in some dark forgotten
corners.
Nevertheless I consider the guile 2 support
to display the
main window. This is not a very accurate test - I looked at the wall clock to
measure this. But
startup time is something users are sensitive to, so it would be interesting to
check for
improvements.
Note that guile 2 now compiles its source files. This happens automatically
whenever
On Nov 26, 2013, at 8:52 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
Would this be a good time to start preferring guile 2 over guile 1.8
when both are available ? It's an easy switch in configure.
That's fine with me. I've been using Guile 2 for the last week or two and
haven't
Let me bring guile 2 up again. The current status is this:
- gnucash is ready for guile2, but depends on a very recent version of swig to
generate guile 2
compatible wrapper code
- in fact *very* recent: swig 2.0.10 has been release today and is the first
version of swig
capable of generating
On May 27, 2013, at 1:45 PM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
Let me bring guile 2 up again. The current status is this:
- gnucash is ready for guile2, but depends on a very recent version of swig
to generate guile 2
compatible wrapper code
- in fact *very* recent: swig
, except that I now believe the dynwind code has
never really be necessary. My work to make GnuCash guile 2 compatible
forced me in many ways to get a deeper understanding of how guile and c
interact. As part of this, I also had to revisit the dynwind construct,
what it does and when/why we should
And just to complete my explanation, you are in fact using the
scm_dynwind_* functions slightly differently from their intended use. In
the example of gnc_scm_to_locale_string the net result is the same, but
in locations where it matters you won't get the desired memory leak
protection effect.
On 22-12-12 10:38, Geert Janssens wrote:
BUT... While writing all this, I noticed I glossed over a subtle
memory issue nonetheless that I have to fix again:
scm_to_locale_string uses malloc to allocate memory for the return
value. The memory should be freed using free. However gnucash is based
/trunk/src/gnome/dialog-tax-info.c
gnucash/trunk/src/import-export/qif-import/assistant-qif-import.c
Log:
Guile 2: replace deprecated SCM_SYMBOL_CHARS function
The replacements require guile 1.8 or above
___
gnucash-patches mailing list
gnucash-patc
are cached, this happens only once for normal users.
The warnings are apparently harmless, because gnucash runs fine in my tests.
Also make check passes for both guile 1.8 and guile 2.0. Word of caution
here though: if you install both guile and guile 2, for one of both the
guile executable
On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
Also make check passes for both guile 1.8 and guile 2.0. Word of caution here
though: if you install both guile and guile 2, for one of both the guile
executable is not guile. In my case, I have guile (1.8
On 18-12-12 19:52, John Ralls wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012, at 10:01 AM, Geert Janssens janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
Also make check passes for both guile 1.8 and guile 2.0. Word of caution here though: if
you install both guile and guile 2, for one of both the guile executable is not
guile
install both guile and guile 2, for one of both the
guile executable is not guile. In my case, I have guile (1.8) and guile2
(2.0). Some tests are hardcoded to execute 'guile' and these tests will
segfault when run against guile2. If you manually fix the tests to execute
guile2, they pass fine
As of r22655 the development branch of gnucash can be built and run
with guile 2. It still spews warnings and the environment variable
GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE should be set to 0, so this is still a work in progress.
It is important to realize though that this is only possible is swig is
properly
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 23:52:25 +0100, Geert Janssens wrote:
Op vrijdag 9 december 2011 10:59:31 schreef Ted Creedon:
Is anyone working on the Guile 2 issues?
Not right now, but it's on my to do list.
I plan to work on it somewhere in the next couple of weeks.
Please keep me informed what's
Is anyone working on the Guile 2 issues?
tedc
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash-devel@gnucash.org
https://lists.gnucash.org/mailman/listinfo/gnucash-devel
Op vrijdag 9 december 2011 10:59:31 schreef Ted Creedon:
Is anyone working on the Guile 2 issues?
Not right now, but it's on my to do list.
I plan to work on it somewhere in the next couple of weeks.
Geert
___
gnucash-devel mailing list
gnucash
On vrijdag 20 mei 2011, Mike Alexander wrote:
--On May 18, 2011 7:23:38 PM +0200 Geert Janssens
janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On vrijdag 6 mei 2011, John Ralls wrote:
On May 6, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Daniel Kraft wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not able to build Gnucash 2.4.5 with Guile 2
--On May 18, 2011 7:23:38 PM +0200 Geert Janssens
janssens-ge...@telenet.be wrote:
On vrijdag 6 mei 2011, John Ralls wrote:
On May 6, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Daniel Kraft wrote:
Hi all,
I'm not able to build Gnucash 2.4.5 with Guile 2 installed --
which is not too surprising, since the API
19 matches
Mail list logo
